Nutt v. Benedict et al
Filing
17
ORDER adopting 13 Report and Recommendations in its entirety and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice as set forth. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on March 6, 2015. (rw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
RYAN ALLEN NUTT
PLAINTIFF
v.
Case no. 14-6032
LYNN BENEDICT, retired Trooper,
Arkansas State Police; JIMMY O.
THOMAS, Trooper, Arkansas State
Police; JANA BRADFORD, Deputy
Prosecuting Attorney; BRYAN CHESSHIR;
Prosecuting Attorney; and CLAY JANSKE,
Attorney
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Now on this 6th day of March, 2015, there comes on for
consideration the report and recommendation (Doc. 13) filed by
the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for
the Western District of Arkansas, in regard to a Motion for
Summary Judgment (Doc. 17) filed by Defendant.
Also before the
Court are Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. 16).
The Court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well
and
sufficiently
advised,
finds
as
follows:
The
report
and
recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in
its entirety.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE on the grounds that the claims are frivolous,
fail
to
asserted
state
claims
against
on
which
individuals
presently cognizable.
relief
immune
can
from
be
suit,
granted,
or
are
are
not
See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii) &
Page 1 of 2
1915A(b)(in
forma
pauperis
action
may
be
dismissed
on
such
grounds at any time).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?