Nutt v. Benedict et al

Filing 17

ORDER adopting 13 Report and Recommendations in its entirety and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice as set forth. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on March 6, 2015. (rw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION RYAN ALLEN NUTT PLAINTIFF v. Case no. 14-6032 LYNN BENEDICT, retired Trooper, Arkansas State Police; JIMMY O. THOMAS, Trooper, Arkansas State Police; JANA BRADFORD, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney; BRYAN CHESSHIR; Prosecuting Attorney; and CLAY JANSKE, Attorney DEFENDANTS ORDER Now on this 6th day of March, 2015, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation (Doc. 13) filed by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, in regard to a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 17) filed by Defendant. Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. 16). The Court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE on the grounds that the claims are frivolous, fail to asserted state claims against on which individuals presently cognizable. relief immune can from be suit, granted, or are are not See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii) & Page 1 of 2 1915A(b)(in forma pauperis action may be dismissed on such grounds at any time). IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?