Walton v. Garland County Detention Center et al
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety. Further granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, see Order for specifics. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on March 26, 2015. (hnc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
ROBERT J. WALTON, III
PLAINTIFF
v.
No. 6:14-cv-06035
GARLAND COUNTY DETENTION CENTER;
DEPUTY JOHN SCHRODER;
CAPTAIN RONNIE BRANSTETTER;
and DEPUTY C. DELAHUNT
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Now on this 26th day of March 2015, there comes on for
consideration
February
24,
the
report
2015,
by
and
the
recommendation
Honorable
Barry
filed
A.
herein
Bryant,
on
United
States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
(Doc. 14).
No objections to the report and recommendation have
been filed. 1
The
court
has
reviewed
this
case
and,
being
well
and
sufficiently advised, finds that the report and recommendation
is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety.
Accordingly,
the
Defendants’
Motion
GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
1
to
Dismiss
(Doc.
7)
is
Plaintiff’s claims against
The Court notes that Plaintiff’s copy of the Report and
Recommendation was returned as undeliverable on March 3, 2015.
The
Court further notes that, after prior mailings were returned to the
Court marked undeliverable, an Order was entered on February 11, 2015,
directing the clerk to change Plaintiff’s address to the home address
he provided to the detention center when he was booked.
(Doc. 13).
Plaintiff has not provided the Court with any other address.
the
Garland
County
Detention
Center
are
DISMISSED
WITH
PREJUDICE, and Plaintiff’s claims based on alleged inadequacies
in the grievance procedure are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
As
to Plaintiff’s remaining claims, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?