Goodin v. Thorton

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety. Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on March 31, 2015. (hnc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION JAMES GOODIN PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 14-6040 DETECTIVE WILLIAM THORTON DEFENDANT ORDER Now on this 31st day of March, 2015, there comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation filed herein on February 23, 2015, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. 9). (Doc. Plaintiff did not file timely, written objections. The court sufficiently has reviewed advised, finds this as case and, follows: being The well and Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint (doc. 2) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE on the grounds that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon with relief may be granted and attempts to assert a claim not presently cognizable under § 1983. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii) & 1915A(b) (in forma pauperis action may be dismissed on such grounds at any time). Plaintiff is advised that this dismissal is considered a Page 1 of 2 “strike” for purposes of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?