Bank of America , N.A. v. Dorsey et al
Filing
27
ORDER granting plaintiff's 26 Motion for Default Judgment re defendant Kay Dorsey as set forth. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on July 14, 2016. (rw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 6:14-cv-6120
KAY DORSEY; ADMINISTRATOR OF
THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION; and
CLARICE M. JOPLIN, individually and as
administrator of the estate of Charles B.
Joplin, deceased
ORDER
DEFENDANTS
Before the Court is the Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment. (ECF No. 26). No response
to this motion has been filed. Plaintiff moves for Default Judgment against Defendant Kay Dorsey
(“Dorsey”).
Plaintiff filed its Complaint against Dorsey, Clarice M. Joplin, and Administrator of the
Small Business Administration on November 6, 2014. (ECF No. 1). Dorsey was served on March
25, 2015. (ECF No. 6). On September 23, 2015, the Clerk filed an Entry of Default as to Dorsey.
(ECF No. 18). On September 24, 2015, Defendants Clarice M. Joplin and Administrator of the
Small Business Administration were dismissed. Dorsey is the only remaining Defendant. Plaintiff
now asks the Court to render default judgment against Dorsey.
This Court has discretion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2) to enter a default judgment. See
Inman v. Am. Home Furniture Placement, Inc., 120 F.3d 117, 118 (8th Cir. 1997). When moving
for a default judgment, the plaintiff must prove its entitlement to its requested relief. Oberstar v.
FDIC, 987 F.2d 494, 505 n.9 (8th Cir. 1993). The Court need not hold a hearing if the relief can be
ascertained from the record. See Stephenson v. El-Batrawi, 524 F.3d 907, 915 (8th Cir. 2008)
(citation omitted). Once default is established, the defaulting defendant does not have standing to
contest the factual allegations of the plaintiff’s complaint. Cf. Everyday Learning Corp. v. Larson,
242 F.3d 815, 818 (8th Cir. 2001) (plaintiff’s assumption “that a default judgment conclusively
establishes liability, as opposed to establishing the fact allegations in the complaint,” was “debatable
proposition”); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(b)(6) (“An allegation — other than one relating to the
amount of damages — is admitted if a responsive pleading is required and the allegation is not
denied.”).
In its Complaint, Plaintiff asserts that, on July 31, 2003, Clarice M. Joplin conveyed a certain
piece of property (“the Property”) to Dorsey via Warranty Deed. Joplin also issued to Dorsey a Quit
Claim Deed for the Property. Plaintiff asserts that a Mortgage in favor of the Small Business
Administration was mistakenly not released at the time of this transfer from Joplin to Dorsey.
In May 2008, Dorsey executed a promissory note (“the Note”) to Quicken Loans, Inc., as
lender on a loan secured by the Property. Dorsey also executed a Homestead Lien Contract and Deed
of Trust (“the Deed of Trust”), granting Quicken a security interest in the Property. In December
2011, Quicken assigned the Note and Deed of Trust to the Plaintiff. Plaintiff asserts that Dorsey
failed to make payments on the Note and Deed of Trust. As of September 30, 2014, at least
$250,873.27 was due. Moreover, the legal description of the Property in the Warranty Deed and
Deed of Trust is different from the legal description contained in the Quit Claim Deed (ECF No. 1-2,
3 & 5).
Plaintiff requests that the Court enter a default judgment (1) reforming the Deed of Trust,
Warranty Deed, and Quit Claim Deed with the correct legal description; (2) declaring that the Deed
of Trust lien encumbers the Property with the corrected legal description; (3) declaring that the Deed
of Trust is a first and superior lien on the Property; and (4) declaring that Plaintiff has the right to
2
foreclose on the property in accordance with the terms of the Note and Deed of Trust, and that
through foreclosure or auction Dorsey is divested of her right, title, and interest in the Property.
The Court has read the pleadings and the papers on file and is of the opinion that the
allegations of Plaintiff’s Complaint have been admitted as to Dorsey. Accordingly, in light of
Dorsey’s default and the nature of Plaintiff’s claims against her, the Court orders as follows:
It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the material allegations of the
Complaint be and are deemed admitted as to Kay Dorsey. An event of default has occurred under
the terms of the Note and Deed of Trust executed by and between Quicken Loans, its successors and
assigns, and Defendant Kay Dorsey on May 14, 2008.
It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff is the owner and
holder of the Note and beneficiary of the Deed of Trust secured by the real property commonly
known as 318 Elmwood Drive, Hot Springs, Arkansas 72901 (the “Property”) and that the Deed of
Trust, Warranty Deed and Quit Claim Deed are reformed to describe the Property as follows:
Lot 17 and 18 of Catherine Shores Sub’d., Garland County, Arkansas, (resurvey); less
and except the following described part of Lot 18: Begin at the SE corner of Lot 18;
thence southwesterly along the dividing line of Lot 18 and 19 126.0 feet; thence
Northwesterly 65.0 feet; Thence Northeasterly 65.0 feet; thence Northeasterly 145.2
feet to the West side of Elmwood Road; thence Southeasterly 46.5 feet to the point
of beginning.
It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff’s Deed of Trust
encumbers the Property.
It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff’s Deed of Trust grants
it a first priority lien on the Property.
It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the following are secured by
3
the security interest in the Property: the outstanding balance of the Note plus attorney fees;
prejudgment interest; post-judgment interest; and costs of court.
It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Bank of America, N.A., or its
successors or assigns, may proceed with foreclosure of the Property as provided in the Deed of Trust.
It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Bank of America, N.A. may
further communicate with Kay Dorsey and all third parties reasonably necessary to conduct the
foreclosure sale.
It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that any notices to Dorsey
regarding the foreclosure of the Property shall be mailed to 318 Elmwood Drive, Hot Springs,
Arkansas 71901.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 14th day of July, 2016.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?