Tidwell II v. Hobbs

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on March 31, 2016. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION DANNY WAYNE TIDWELL II v. PETITIONER Case No. 6:15-CV-06024 WENDY KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections RESPONDENT ORDER Currently before the Court are the findings and recommendations (Doc. 9) of the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, Chief United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. 10). Upon due consideration, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s objections are unspecific and offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Magistrate’s findings and recommendations and that the Magistrate’s report does not otherwise contain any clear error. The Magistrate’s report (Doc. 9) is therefore ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the report, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 7) is GRANTED, and the instant petition is denied as successive and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability be issued. Judgment will be entered accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of March, 2016. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?