Pollock v. Kelly et al
ORDER ADOPTING 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; further GRANTING 20 Motion for Summary Judgment. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on February 13, 2017. (hnc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
DON RICHARD POLLOCK
Civil No. 6:15-cv-06066
WENDY KELLY; and
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed January 19, 2017, by the
Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
(ECF No. 28). Plaintiff filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 2, 2016,
alleging that his constitutional rights were violated because Defendants failed to protect him
from attack by a fellow inmate. (ECF No. 1).
Defendants filed a summary judgment motion on July 28, 2016. (ECF No. 20).
Defendants argue they are entitled to summary judgment because (1) Plaintiff failed to exhaust
his administrative remedies prior to filing suit; (2) Plaintiff failed to state a constitutional claim
against them; (3) Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity on the individual capacity
claims; and (4) Defendants are entitled to sovereign immunity on the official capacity claims.
Judge Bryant recommends that Defendants’ summary judgment motion should be granted
because Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies pursuant to the Prison Litigation
Reform Act (PLRA), 42 U.S.C. § 1997(e)(a). In light of the foregoing, Judge Bryant did not
address Defendants’ other arguments in favor of summary judgment.
No party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object
See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Upon review, the Court adopts the Report and
Recommendation in toto. Accordingly, the Court finds that Defendants’ summary judgment
motion (ECF No. 20) should be and hereby is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s action is DISMISSED
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 13th day of February, 2017.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?