Doering v. Reed et al

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in toto; Plaintiffs claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-iii) and 1915A(a). Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on June 3, 2016. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION ALAN DOERING v. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 6:15-CV-6093 REED (Assistant Director of ADC); WARDEN FAUST; SGT. MELUGIN; and SGT. RYAN DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed April 29, 2016, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 9. Judge Bryant recommends that Plaintiff’s claims against all Defendants be dismissed. No party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-iii) and 1915A(a). The dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Thus, the Clerk is directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 3rd day of June, 2016. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?