Dunn v. Bethel et al

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's Claims against separate Defendants Blake Batson, Timothy Beckman, Caddo Valley, Clark County, J.D. Crowe, Jr, Randy Hill, Robert McCallum, Janice Williams, Robert Williams, Jailer Archer, and the City of Arkadelphia are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See Order for specifics. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on September 13, 2016. (hnc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION JOHN PAUL DUNN VS. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 6:16-cv-6006 OFFICER ROY BETHEL, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed August 24, 2016, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 12). Judge Bryant recommends that Plaintiff’s claims be dismissed without prejudice as to Separate Defendants Judge Robert McCallum; Judge Randy Hill; Public Defender Beckman; Public Defender Williams; Prosecutor Batson; City of Arkadelphia; City of Caddo Valley; Clark County; Deputy J.D. Crowe, Jr.; Jailer Robert Williams; and Jailer Archer. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Plaintiff’s claims against the Separate Defendants listed above are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The following claims remain for further consideration: Claim One for false arrest and imprisonment in both personal and official capacities against Defendants Collier, Bethel, Watson, Forga, Avant, Morrison, Cain, and Whitworth; and Claim Two for denial of medical care in both personal and official capacities against Defendants Mayhue, Wyndham, Morrison, and Foley. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 13th day of September, 2016. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?