Maze, LLC v. Davidson et al

Filing 37

JUDGMENT; Plaintiff's Equal Protection and Freedom of Information Act claims against Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's claims alleging a taking are not ripe for adjudication, and are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on August 17, 2017. (hnc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION MAZE, LLC v. PLAINTIFF No. 6:16-CV-6029 SUZANNE DAVIDSON, ELAINE JONES, BECCA CLARK, LARRY WILLAMS, RICK RAMICK, and RANDY FALE, each in their official capacities as Directors of the City of Hot Springs, Arkansas, RUTH CARNEY, in her official capacity as Mayor of the City of Hot Springs, Arkansas, and BILL BURROUGH, in his capacity as acting City Manager of the City of Hot Springs, Arkansas, and the CITY OF HOT SPRINGS, ARKANSAS DEFENDANTS Judgment For the reasons set forth in the Court’s opinion and order filed on this day, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s Equal Protection and Freedom of Information Act claims against Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s claims alleging a taking are not ripe for adjudication, and are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that all of Plaintiff’s remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of August, 2017. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?