Godbold v. Hammons et al

Filing 44

JUDGMENT granting 33 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's case is herey DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, as set forth in 43 Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on October 19, 2018. (mjm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
TYRONG GODBOLD
V.

PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 6:16-CV-06073

JOHN HAMMONS, individually
and in his official capacities; PATRICK LANGLEY,
individually and in his official capacities;
THE CITY OF HOT SPRINGS, a municipal corporation
and public body corporate and politic;
BRANDON JONES, individually and in his official
capacities; DAVID FLORY, individually and in
his official capacity as former Chief of Police; and
JASON STACHEY, in his official capacity as Chief of Police
Hot Springs Police Department

DEFENDANTS

JUDGMENT
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 33. Plaintiff has
filed a response. ECF No. 38. Defendants have filed a reply. ECF No. 41. The Court finds this
matter ripe for consideration.
For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, the Court finds that
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 33) should be and hereby is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 19th day of October, 2018.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge