Tubbs v. Garland County, Arkansas et al

Filing 64

JUDGMENT that Plaintiff's official capacity 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against Defendant Scotty Dodd and Plaintiffs state law claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and Plaintiffs official capacity 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against all other Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on March 9, 2018. (lw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
BRANDON MICHAEL TUBBS
v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 6:17-CV-06032

GARLAND COUNTY, ARKANSAS, et al.

DEFENDANTS

JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the opinion and order entered in this case on this date, and the opinion and
order entered in this case on June 30, 2017, IT IS CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED
that Plaintiff’s official capacity 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against Defendant Scotty Dodd and
Plaintiff’s state law claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and
Plaintiff’s official capacity 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against all other Defendants are DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ADJUDGED this 9th day of March, 2018.

/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE