Thompson v. Spa City Steaks, Inc.

Filing 77

ORDER granting 75 Motion to Withdraw Pleadings. Accordingly, the parties' Motions for Summary Judgment 40 and 41 along with 46 Defendants Motion for Decertification are WITHDRAWN. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on March 29, 2019. (hnc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION CHEVON THOMPSON, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 6:17-cv-6055 SPA CITY STEAKS, INC. d/b/a COLTON’S STEAKHOUSE AND GRILL DEFENDANT ORDER Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Withdraw Pleadings. (ECF No. 75). The parties state that they are actively engaged in settlement negations. To allow for time to reach a full settlement, the parties request that their pending Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 40 and 41) and Defendant’s Motion for Decertification (ECF No. 46) be withdrawn while settlement efforts continue. The parties request that if a settlement cannot be reached within sixty (60) days that the court enter a new scheduling order and that they be allowed to file additional motions, including those requested to be withdrawn. Upon consideration, the parties’ Joint Motion to Withdraw Pleadings (ECF No. 75) is GRANTED. Accordingly, the parties’ Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 40 and 41) and Defendant’s Motion for Decertification (ECF No. 46) are WITHDRAWN. If the parties fail to settle this matter within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, a new scheduling order shall issue. At such time, the parties may file any additional motions, including those that are being withdrawn, with or without amendment, in accordance with the deadlines imposed by the new scheduling order. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 29th day of March, 2019. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?