Kemp v. Correct Care Solution, Inc. et al

Filing 66

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion for Reconsideration for Subpoena. See Order for specifics. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on August 6, 2018. (hnc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION LAMAR KEMP v. PLAINTIFF Civil No.6:17-cv-06084 CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, INC.; DR. NANETTE VOWELL; and HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR ANDREA BEASLEY DEFENDANTS ORDER This is a civil rights action filed by Plaintiff Lamar Kemp pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider Motion for Subpoena. (ECF No. 60). Defendants have filed a Response in opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 65). The Court finds the matter ripe for consideration. On June 4, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking subpoenas for two witnesses – Mrs. Francis and Mona Ungefug - both employees of the Arkansas Spinal Cord Commission. (ECF No. 42). Defendants argued Plaintiff’s request was untimely and sought information and the testimony of witnesses which he failed to disclose during discovery. (ECF No. 47). The Court initially found Plaintiff’s request for subpoena of witnesses and documents he failed to disclose during the discovery period was not only untimely but would unduly prejudice Defendant at this stage of the litigation. (ECF No. 55). In the instant motion for reconsideration, Plaintiff points out that he did disclose to Defendants during discovery that he intended to call Mrs. Francis, Mona Ungefug and Dr. Felix as witnesses at the trial of this case. (ECF No. 6, p. 2). Defendants now concede that Plaintiff did disclose to them his intention to call these individuals as witnesses. (ECF No. 65, p. 2). The discovery deadline – originally set for February 28, 2018 - was extended on March 31, 2018, until April 13, 2018. (ECF No. 31). This same order directed Defendants to file a motion     for summary judgment by May 14, 2018. Id. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on May 14, 2018. (ECF No. 36). On June 4, 2018, Plaintiff filed his response to the motion. (ECF No. 43). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration for Subpoena (ECF No. 60) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff’ may re-submit his request to subpoena Mrs. Francis, Mona Ungefug, and Dr. Felix, as witnesses for trial if this case survives summary judgment. However, Plaintiff’s request to subpoena these individuals for discovery is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of August 2018. /s/ J. Marschewski HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?