Hamm v. Liggett et al
ORDER granting 22 Motion to Admit Evidence. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on October 31, 2017. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
LLOYD N. HAMM, JR.
Civil No. 6:17-cv-06089
DR. CHARLES LIGGETT, Correct
Care Solutions; and NURSE DREAM
M REDIC-YOUNG, Correct Care Solutions
Plaintiff Lloyd N. Hamm, Jr.’s Complaint was filed in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pro se
on August 31, 2017. ECF No. 1. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Admit Evidence. (ECF
Plaintiff’s motion seeks to bring to the Court’s attention additional evidence and
arguments relating to his claim against Defendants. A motion to admit evidence is not the proper
avenue for presenting evidence or arguments to the Court. Plaintiff’s claims have been stated in
his complaint. However, the Court will consider the additional evidence in Plaintiff’s motion as
exhibits to his Response (ECF No. 20) to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
In the future, any additional exhibits Plaintiff has to support his claims should be properly
submitted in connection with a motion for summary judgment or at an evidentiary hearing in the
event the claims against these Defendants proceed.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Admit Evidence (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of October 2017.
Mark E. Ford
HON. MARK E. FORD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?