Hamm v. Liggett et al

Filing 23

ORDER granting 22 Motion to Admit Evidence. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on October 31, 2017. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION LLOYD N. HAMM, JR. v. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 6:17-cv-06089 DR. CHARLES LIGGETT, Correct Care Solutions; and NURSE DREAM M REDIC-YOUNG, Correct Care Solutions DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff Lloyd N. Hamm, Jr.’s Complaint was filed in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pro se on August 31, 2017. ECF No. 1. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Admit Evidence. (ECF No. 22). Plaintiff’s motion seeks to bring to the Court’s attention additional evidence and arguments relating to his claim against Defendants. A motion to admit evidence is not the proper avenue for presenting evidence or arguments to the Court. Plaintiff’s claims have been stated in his complaint. However, the Court will consider the additional evidence in Plaintiff’s motion as exhibits to his Response (ECF No. 20) to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. In the future, any additional exhibits Plaintiff has to support his claims should be properly submitted in connection with a motion for summary judgment or at an evidentiary hearing in the event the claims against these Defendants proceed. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Admit Evidence (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of October 2017. /s/ Mark E. Ford HON. MARK E. FORD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?