Stell v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Filing 16

JUDGMENT granting 13 Unopposed Motion to Remand. Further, REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER AND REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) as set forth in the 15 Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on March 7, 2018. (mjm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION CONNIE S. STELL vs. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 6:17-cv-06111 NANCY A. BERRYHILL Commissioner, Social Security Administration DEFENDANT JUDGMENT Comes now the Court on this the 7th day of March 2018, in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered in the above-styled case on today’s date, and GRANTS the Defendants’s Unopposed Motion to Remand. ECF No. 13. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed, and this matter is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). If Plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney's fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an application may be filed up to thirty (30) days after the judgment becomes "not appealable," i.e., thirty (30) days after the sixty (60) day time for appeal has ended. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296, 113 S.Ct. 2625 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B),(d)(2)(G). IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED. /s/ Barry A. Bryant HON. BARRY A. BRYANT U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?