McArty v. Littleton et al

Filing 101

JUDGMENT granting 89 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Further, denying 82 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on September 1, 2020. (mjm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
RANDALL THOMAS MCARTY
v.

PLAINTIFF
Civil No. 6:18-cv-06032

WARDEN NURZAHAL FAUST, Ouachita
Regional Correction Unit

DEFENDANT

JUDGMENT
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 82), Defendant’s
Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 89), and the parties’ various responses and
replies associated with the motions. The motions are ripe for the Court’s consideration.
For the reasons discussed in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, the Court finds that
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 89) should be and hereby is GRANTED.
For the same reasons, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.
82) should be and hereby is DENIED. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 1st day of September, 2020.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
Chief United States District Judge