McArty v. Littleton et al
ORDER denying 74 Motion to Issue Subpoena, as set forth. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on October 4, 2019. (mjm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
RANDALL THOMAS MCARTY
Civil No. 6:18-cv-06032
WARDEN NURZAHAL FAUST
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Issue Subpoena on Non-Party and Defendant’s
Response to Plaintiff’s Motion. (ECF No. 74 and 75). In the Motion, Plaintiff seeks the production
of information concerning Defendant Faust, specifically with respect to “how many times she has
been accused of retaliating against inmates and the number of times she has been discipline[d] for
The Defendant’s Response argues that it does not maintain a database of
grievances or complaints filed against employees, but rather that grievances or complaints are
maintained in each inmate’s file; that such material would be irrelevant to Plaintiff’s case; and,
that such information is not likely to lead to discoverable information.
The Court, noting that the Arkansas Department of Correction does not maintain a database
of such information, and being mindful of the constraints of the Federal Rules of Evidence, finds
that Plaintiff’s Motion should be, and hereby is, DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 4th day of October 2019.
/s/ Barry A. Bryant
HON. BARRY A. BRYANT
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?