Johnson v. Ruh et al

Filing 84

ORDER ADOPTING 83 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in toto; Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs Complaint 1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on January 10, 2022. (jlm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
CHARLES SAMUEL JOHNSON, JR.
v.

PLAINTIFF
Case No. 6:20-cv-06018

MAJOR ANDREW RUH; DEPUTY WARDEN
WHITE; and SERGEANT HARRISON

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed December 20, 2021, by the Honorable
Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 83).
Plaintiff proceeds in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pro se and in forma pauperis. Judge Bryant recommended
that this case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), based on Plaintiff’s failure
to prosecute his case and failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).
Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has
passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, the Court finds that the report is without clear error and
should be and hereby is adopted in toto. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF
No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of January 2022.

Robert T. Dawson

/s/

ROBERT T. DAWSON
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

1