Johnson v. Ruh et al

Filing 84

ORDER ADOPTING 83 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in toto; Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs Complaint 1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on January 10, 2022. (jlm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION CHARLES SAMUEL JOHNSON, JR. v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 6:20-cv-06018 MAJOR ANDREW RUH; DEPUTY WARDEN WHITE; and SERGEANT HARRISON DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed December 20, 2021, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 83). Plaintiff proceeds in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pro se and in forma pauperis. Judge Bryant recommended that this case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), based on Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute his case and failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, the Court finds that the report is without clear error and should be and hereby is adopted in toto. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of January 2022. Robert T. Dawson /s/ ROBERT T. DAWSON SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?