Titus v. Harris et al
Filing
9
ORDER adopting 8 Report and Recommendations in toto. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 7 is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on this case for future judicial consideration.. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on June 6, 2024. (jlm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
MICHAEL TITUS
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 6:24-cv-6044
RAPPER T.I. HARRIS, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) issued by the Honorable Barry
A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 8. After
screening Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, Judge Bryant recommends that
Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 7) be dismissed without prejudice for failure to
state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Judge Bryant further recommends that a strike flag
be placed on this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) for future judicial consideration. Plaintiff
has not filed an objection to the R&R and the time to do so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Upon review, finding that there is no clear error on the face of the record and that Judge
Bryant’s reasoning is sound, the Court adopts the R&R (ECF No. 8) in toto. Plaintiff’s Second
Amended Complaint (ECF No. 7) is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk
of Court is hereby directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on this case for future judicial
consideration.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 6th day of June, 2024.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
Chief United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?