Levac v. Haney et al

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in toto; Plaintiffs Amended Complaint 12 is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is hereby directed to place a 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) strike flag on the case for future judicial consideration. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on June 4, 2024. (tmc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION DANIEL LEVAC v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 6:24-cv-06047 JAIL ADMINISTRATOR SARAH HANEY, Pike County Jail; SHERIFF TRAVIS HILL, Pike County; SHERIFF GARRETT, Garland County; CORRECTIONS OFFICER STAPLETON, Garland County Sheriff’s Office; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WILL; Pike County Jail; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ADRIANNA, Pike County Jail; JOHN DOES 1-26, DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 16. Judge Bryant recommends that this case be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, finding that there is no clear error on the face of the record and that Judge Bryant’s reasoning is sound, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 16) in toto. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 12) is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is hereby directed to place a 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) strike flag on the case for future judicial consideration. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that any appeal from this dismissal will not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 4th day of June, 2024. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?