Test
Filing
241
TEST by Duty Magistrate Judge. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 12/7/2012. (rrey)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES − GENERAL
Case No.: 2:50−cv−00123−DUTY
Title: TEST
Date:
12/5/2012
Present: The Honorable Duty Magistrate Judge , U. S. District Judge
Deputy Clerk: Roel Reyes
Court Reporter: None
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
None
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
None
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR
LACK OF PROSECUTION
The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff(s), to show cause in writing
no later than December 7, 2012 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of
prosecution as to defendant. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the
Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this
OSC, on or before the above date:
Answer by the defendant; or
Plaintiff(s) filing an Application for Default (FRCivP 55a).
It is plaintiff's responsibility to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the
action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to
respond. If necessary, plaintiff(s) must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon the
default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be
approved by the Court. Local Rule 8.3.
No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order
will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the
date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. Plaintiff's counsel is ordered to serve this
minute order on all defendant's.
: 00
Initials of Preparer: rrey
CV−90
CIVIL MINUTES − GENERAL
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?