Orantes-Hernandez v. Gonzales

Filing 902

PROTECTIVE ORDER APPROVED by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton re Stipulation for Protective Order 899 (See Order for Details) (rh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2 3 CROSBY WILFREDO ORANTESHERNANDEZ, et al., 4 Plaintiffs, 5 6 vs. 7 ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General, et al., 8 Defendants. ) ) ) ) Case No.: 82-01107 MMM (VBKx) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 9 10 11 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER In accordance with the Court’s July 17, 2014 Order (ECF No. 897), the parties are 12 engaging in limited discovery concerning the Government’s compliance with the injunction in 13 14 this case. In the course of this discovery, the Government may produce to class counsel certain 15 information relating to class members who are not named plaintiffs in this case. The 16 Government agrees to produce to class counsel unredacted information relating to class members 17 during discovery, and/or as ordered by the Court, subject to entry of the following protective 18 order in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, to which the parties have 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 stipulated. 1 WHEREFORE, this matter comes before this Court on the parties’ joint stipulation for 2 the entry of a protective order governing confidential information. Good cause exists for the 3 entry of a protective order because discovery in this action may result in the disclosure by the 4 parties of personal and confidential non-privileged information, including electronic database 5 information, possibly from alien files (or “A-files”), and other information concerning members 6 of the class certified in this action and other individuals. The parties having agreed to the 7 following terms governing the treatment of confidential information, and the Court having found 8 good cause exists for the issuance of an appropriately-tailored confidentiality order, 9 10 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(11), this protective order 11 authorizes Defendants to produce personally identifiable information that would otherwise be 12 prohibited from disclosure under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and without presenting 13 Privacy Act objections to this Court for a decision regarding disclosure. To the extent the 14 Privacy Act allows the disclosure of information pursuant to a Court order, this Order constitutes 15 such a Court Order and authorizes the disclosure of that information. This Protective Order also 16 authorizes Defendants to produce information contained in or pertaining to asylum claims or 17 applications, including records pertaining to credible fear determinations, interviews or reviews, 18 19 applications for relief under the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, 20 Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (“CAT”) and other information that would 21 otherwise be prohibited from disclosure pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 208.6 and 8 C.F.R. § 1208.6. 22 However, nothing in this paragraph shall require production of information that is prohibited 23 from disclosure (even with the entry of this protective order) by other applicable privileges, 24 25 26 statutes, regulations or authorities by which Defendants may be bound. The terms of this 1 2 3 Protective Order shall also govern the safeguarding of such information by all individuals referenced herein. Such disclosure is subject to the following conditions: 1. The terms of this protective order will govern the entirety of any record or information 4 covered by the Privacy Act which has been or will be produced in this case in the course 5 of discovery, or under any related future orders of the Court. 6 2. The parties agree that this protective order, and any limitations or restrictions contained 7 herein, 8 a. shall apply to information exchanged between the parties in this litigation; 9 10 b. shall not preclude any party from disclosing information that is publicly available 11 from a document or documents that are not subject to this protective order; 12 c. shall not preclude class counsel from making contact with class members based 13 on information obtained under this protective order, although class counsel may 14 not share or release the information to class members other than the individual to 15 whom the information pertains; 16 d. shall not preclude release by either party of information previously marked as 17 subject to the protective order if the individual(s) about whom the information to 18 19 20 be released pertains affirmatively consents, in writing, to its disclosure; and e. shall not prohibit either party from sharing with the Court any information marked 21 as subject to this protective order, provided such information is filed pursuant to 22 the rules governing the filing of protected information. 23 24 3. To the extent that the Parties produce any documents or records that contain class members’ names, addresses, birth dates, alien registration numbers, or any other 25 identifying information (i.e., information the use of which would allow the identification 26 1 of the person to whom the information relates), such identifying information shall be 2 deemed confidential and protected by this protective order. All Privacy Act information 3 is subject to this protective order and may be used solely for purposes relating to this 4 litigation – Orantes-Hernandez, et al. v. Holder, et al., Case No.: 82-01107 MMM-VBKx 5 (C.D. Cal.) – including any appeal of any decision(s) this Court issues with respect to this 6 litigation. 7 4. Counsel for the parties shall designate documents containing confidential information as 8 confidential by placing the word “COVERED BY PROTECTIVE ORDER” or the 9 10 11 12 13 following label (or a substantial equivalent) on them or on any copies thereof, or any cover sheets thereon: THIS DOCUMENT IS SUBJECT TO A COURT ORDER IN ORANTES-HERNANDEZ, ET AL. V. HOLDER, ET AL., CASE NO.: 82-01107 MMM-VBKx (C.D. Cal.). THIS DOCUMENT AND ITS CONTENTS SHALL NOT BE USED, SHOWN OR DISTRIBUTED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN THE PROTECTIVE ORDER. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 5. Protected information may be disclosed only to the following persons and only as provided in paragraph (3): a. class counsel, Defendants’ counsel, and any support staff or other employees of such counsel assisting in this action with an appropriate need to know; b. any experts or consultants retained by the Parties for purposes of this litigation, if they agree in writing to be bound by the terms of this order; 21 c. the Court and its personnel; 22 23 d. court reporters, translators, and other litigation support personnel; 24 e. the author of the document or the original source of the information; 25 f. any other person mutually authorized by the parties’ counsel to examine such 26 information with an appropriate need to know; and 1 2 g. any Court of Appeals and its personnel, in the event of an appeal of any decision this Court issues with respect to this litigation. 3 6. All persons listed in Paragraph 5(a) above to whom identifying information is disclosed 4 are hereby prohibited from disclosing to, or otherwise discussing with, any person other 5 than those listed in 5(a)-(f) above, any confidential information, except as provided in 6 this protective order. 7 7. No protected documents or information shall be used at any hearing, trial or appellate 8 proceeding in this action, unless reasonable provisions are made to protect the 9 10 confidentiality of this protected information, such as by filing under seal. Where 11 protected documents or information is used at a hearing, trial, or appellate proceeding in 12 this action, the appropriate portion of the court transcript shall be placed under seal. 13 8. Within five years after the date of production of any document produced under this 14 protective order, or within eight years after the date of production of any document 15 produced under this protective order that becomes the subject of litigation in this case, 16 counsel for the receiving party shall return the document to counsel for the producing 17 party or, alternatively, certify in writing that the document has been destroyed. 18 19 9. The parties may, by stipulation, provide for exceptions to this order and any party may 20 apply to this Court at any time, upon proper notice, for a modification of this protective 21 order with respect to the handling or designation of any document or for any other 22 purpose. 23 24 25 26 10. This order does not prohibit or otherwise waive any other privilege (e.g., law enforcement privilege, attorney client privilege, deliberative process privilege, etc.) that 1 2 3 4 5 6 the parties might assert with regard to any information requested during the course of discovery. 11. This order shall be binding upon any present and future party to this case, including any appeal of any decision(s) of this Court with respect to this litigation. 12. If a party has a good faith belief after producing a document to an opposing party that the document should have been marked as produced under the terms of this protective order 7 but was not, the producing party shall immediately notify the receiving party in writing of 8 the inadvertent disclosure. The receiving party shall immediately treat the document as 9 10 11 protected under the terms of this order until the matter can be resolved between the parties or, in the alternative, by the Court under paragraph 9 of this protective order. 12 13 14 Dated: August 26, 2014 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ______________/s/____________________ The Honorable Victor B. Kenton United States Magistrate Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?