Kimble v. Jeanne Woodford

Filing 373

JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, in favor of Eric Kimble against Jeanne Woodford: The petition for writ of habeas corpus as to the rape murder specialcircumstance finding and sentence of death in the case of People v. Eric DwayneKimble, Case No. A345207 of the California Superior Court for the County of LosAngeles, is hereby GRANTED. The judgment of conviction on the rape murderspecial circumstance, and the sentence of death, shall be VACATED. Please refer to the Court's Judgment for further details. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (cr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 ERIC KIMBLE, Petitioner, 13 v. 14 RON DAVIS, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin, 15 16 17 18 19 Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. CV 90-4826 SVW DEATH PENALTY CASE JUDGMENT IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be CONDITIONALLY GRANTED IN PART, as follows: 20 The petition for writ of habeas corpus as to the rape murder special 21 circumstance finding and sentence of death in the case of People v. Eric Dwayne 22 Kimble, Case No. A345207 of the California Superior Court for the County of Los 23 Angeles, is hereby GRANTED. The judgment of conviction on the rape murder 24 special circumstance, and the sentence of death, shall be VACATED. 25 In all other respects, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. 26 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the State of California shall, within 120 27 days from the entry of this Judgment, either grant petitioner a new trial on the rape 28 murder special circumstance, or vacate the rape murder special circumstance 1 finding and death sentence and resentence petitioner in accordance with California 2 law and the United States Constitution. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 19, 2017 5 STEPHEN V. WILSON United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?