Daniel Berdakin v. Consuldado De La, et al

Filing 51

RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK 46 , 50 : Judgment as entered in the above captioned matter on May 23, 2007 in favor of Judgment Creditor, DANIEL BERDAKIN, individually and dba SKY 1 APARTMENTS, located at 101 S. Rossmore Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90004, and against Judgment Debtor, CONSULADO DE LA REPUBLICA DE EL SALVADOR shall be renewed as follows: Judgment as entered: $98,374.92.00; Credits: -0-; Subtotal: 98,374.92; Interest 95,089.00 forTotal Renewed Judgment: $ 193,463.92. (lc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 BARRY R. EDWARDS, ESQ., BAR NO. 53466 SPIEGELMAN and EDWARDS 9903 Santa Monica Boulevard Suite 1200 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Telephone: (323) 876-7451 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Creditor DANIEL BERDAKIN, individually and dba SKY 1 APARTMENTS 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL BERDAKIN, individually and dba SKY 1 APARTMENTS, CASE NO. CV95-6145 DDP (ANX) 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK vs. CONSULADO DE LA REPUBLICA DE EL SALVADOR, Defendant. ______________________________________ IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Judgment as entered in the above captioned matter on May 23, 2007 in favor of Judgment Creditor, DANIEL BERDAKIN, individually and dba 20 SKY 1 APARTMENTS, located at 101 S. Rossmore Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90004, and 21 22 23 24 25 26 against Judgment Debtor, CONSULADO DE LA REPUBLICA DE EL SALVADOR, 3450 Wilshire Boulevard, #250, Los Angeles, California 90010, shall be renewed as follows: Judgment as entered: Credits: Subtotal: Interest Total Renewed Judgment: 98,374.92 -098,374.92 95,089.00 $ 193,463.92 27 28 January 26,2017 DATED: ___________________ ____________________________________ ___________ Deputy Clerk _ Clerk, U.S. DISTRICT COURT 1 RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?