Daniel Berdakin v. Consuldado De La, et al
Filing
51
RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK 46 , 50 : Judgment as entered in the above captioned matter on May 23, 2007 in favor of Judgment Creditor, DANIEL BERDAKIN, individually and dba SKY 1 APARTMENTS, located at 101 S. Rossmore Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90004, and against Judgment Debtor, CONSULADO DE LA REPUBLICA DE EL SALVADOR shall be renewed as follows: Judgment as entered: $98,374.92.00; Credits: -0-; Subtotal: 98,374.92; Interest 95,089.00 forTotal Renewed Judgment: $ 193,463.92. (lc)
1
2
3
4
BARRY R. EDWARDS, ESQ., BAR NO. 53466
SPIEGELMAN and EDWARDS
9903 Santa Monica Boulevard
Suite 1200
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Telephone: (323) 876-7451
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Creditor DANIEL BERDAKIN, individually and dba
SKY 1 APARTMENTS
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL BERDAKIN, individually and dba
SKY 1 APARTMENTS,
CASE NO. CV95-6145 DDP (ANX)
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT
BY CLERK
vs.
CONSULADO DE LA REPUBLICA DE
EL SALVADOR,
Defendant.
______________________________________
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Judgment as entered in the above captioned matter
on May 23, 2007 in favor of Judgment Creditor, DANIEL BERDAKIN, individually and dba
20
SKY 1 APARTMENTS, located at 101 S. Rossmore Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90004, and
21
22
23
24
25
26
against Judgment Debtor, CONSULADO DE LA REPUBLICA DE EL SALVADOR, 3450
Wilshire Boulevard, #250, Los Angeles, California 90010, shall be renewed as follows:
Judgment as entered:
Credits:
Subtotal:
Interest
Total Renewed Judgment:
98,374.92
-098,374.92
95,089.00
$ 193,463.92
27
28
January 26,2017
DATED: ___________________
____________________________________
___________ Deputy Clerk
_
Clerk, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
1
RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?