Jose A. Valenzuela v. Shawn Hatten, et al

Filing 54

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Christina A. Snyder for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 51 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and the Objections. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the f indings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge with the exception that on page 12, line 18, the word "not" is added after the word "did." The sentence should read: "Here, by contrast, Petitioner did not enter a no contest or guilty plea, and there was no agreement between the prosecutor,defense counsel and court as to concurrent sentences." IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (mp)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOSE ANGEL VALENZUELA,

12

Petitioner,

13
14
15
16
17
18

v.
G. HARRIS, Warden,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. CV 98-3947-CAS (AGR)

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATION OF
MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of

19

Habeas Corpus, the other records on file herein, the Report and

20

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and the Objections.

21

Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the

22

Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court

23

accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge with the

24

exception that on page 12, line 18, the word “not” is added after the word “did.”

25

The sentence should read: “Here, by contrast, Petitioner did not enter a no

26

contest or guilty plea, and there was no agreement between the prosecutor,

27

defense counsel and court as to concurrent sentences.”

28

1
2

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the
Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

3
4

September 14, 2017
DATED: ______________________

CHRISTINA A. SNYDER
United States District Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2