T. Jeffrey Simpson, et al v. Homestore.Com, Inc., et al

Filing 1408

ORDER re 1398 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Court GRANTS Lead Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice of the judgment in Joe H. Miller, et al. v. Manuel P. Asensio, et al., the amended judgment in that action, and the partial judgment in Chubb & Son, Inc. et al. v. Kelleher, et al. 1401 pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201. Fed. R. Evid. 201. The Court DENIES Defendant's request for the entry of judgment in his favor against Lead Plaintiff California State Teachers' Retir ement System in this Action, as well as Defendant's request for costs against Lead Plaintiff California State Teachers' Retirement System. The Court finds that Defendant has not established that he is entitled to Judgment in this Action against Lead Plaintiff California State Teachers' Retirement System, or that he is entitled to costs against Lead Plaintiff California State Teachers' Retirement System. (lom)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 In re: 10 HOMESTORE.COM, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 This Document Relates 14 To: 15 All Actions 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Master File No. CV 01-11115-RSWL (CWx) ORDER The Court is presently in receipt of Lead Plaintiff California State Teachers’ Retirement System (“Lead Plaintiff”) and Defendant Stuart H. Wolff’s (“Defendant”) Joint and Separate Statements of the 21 Parties Regarding Judgment [1398]. Having reviewed all 22 papers submitted, the Court NOW FINDS AND RULES AS 23 FOLLOWS: 24 25 26 27 28 As a threshold matter, the Court GRANTS Lead Plaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice of the judgment in Joe H. Miller, et al. v. Manuel P. Asensio, et al., the amended judgment in that action, and the partial 1 1 2 3 4 judgment in Chubb & Son, Inc. et al. v. Kelleher, et al. [1401] pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201. Fed. R. Evid. 201. The Court DENIES Defendant’s request for the entry 5 of judgment in his favor against Lead Plaintiff 6 California State Teachers’ Retirement System in this 7 Action, as well as Defendant’s request for costs 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 against Lead Plaintiff California State Teachers’ Retirement System. The Court finds that Defendant has not established that he is entitled to Judgment in this Action against Lead Plaintiff California State Teachers’ Retirement System, or that he is entitled to costs against Lead Plaintiff California State Teachers’ Retirement System. See Miller v. Asensio & Co., Inc., 364 F.3d 223 (4th Cir. 2004). 17 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 DATED: August 30, 2011. 22 23 24 HONORABLE RONALD S.W. LEW 25 Senior, U.S. District Court Judge 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?