T. Jeffrey Simpson, et al v. Homestore.Com, Inc., et al

Filing 1408

ORDER re 1398 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Court GRANTS Lead Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice of the judgment in Joe H. Miller, et al. v. Manuel P. Asensio, et al., the amended judgment in that action, and the partial judgment in Chubb & Son, Inc. et al. v. Kelleher, et al. 1401 pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201. Fed. R. Evid. 201. The Court DENIES Defendant's request for the entry of judgment in his favor against Lead Plaintiff California State Teachers' Retir ement System in this Action, as well as Defendant's request for costs against Lead Plaintiff California State Teachers' Retirement System. The Court finds that Defendant has not established that he is entitled to Judgment in this Action against Lead Plaintiff California State Teachers' Retirement System, or that he is entitled to costs against Lead Plaintiff California State Teachers' Retirement System. (lom)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 In re:
10 HOMESTORE.COM, INC.
SECURITIES LITIGATION
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
This Document Relates
14 To:
15
All Actions
16
17
18
19
20

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Master File No.
CV 01-11115-RSWL (CWx)
ORDER

The Court is presently in receipt of Lead Plaintiff
California State Teachers’ Retirement System (“Lead
Plaintiff”) and Defendant Stuart H. Wolff’s
(“Defendant”) Joint and Separate Statements of the

21
Parties Regarding Judgment [1398].

Having reviewed all

22
papers submitted, the Court NOW FINDS AND RULES AS
23
FOLLOWS:
24
25
26
27
28

As a threshold matter, the Court GRANTS Lead
Plaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice of the judgment
in Joe H. Miller, et al. v. Manuel P. Asensio, et al.,
the amended judgment in that action, and the partial
1

1
2
3
4

judgment in Chubb & Son, Inc. et al. v. Kelleher, et
al. [1401] pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201.
Fed. R. Evid. 201.
The Court DENIES Defendant’s request for the entry

5
of judgment in his favor against Lead Plaintiff
6
California State Teachers’ Retirement System in this
7
Action, as well as Defendant’s request for costs
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

against Lead Plaintiff California State Teachers’
Retirement System.

The Court finds that Defendant has

not established that he is entitled to Judgment in this
Action against Lead Plaintiff California State
Teachers’ Retirement System, or that he is entitled to
costs against Lead Plaintiff California State Teachers’
Retirement System. See Miller v. Asensio & Co., Inc.,
364 F.3d 223 (4th Cir. 2004).

17
18
19
20 IT IS SO ORDERED.
21 DATED: August 30, 2011.
22
23
24

HONORABLE RONALD S.W. LEW

25

Senior, U.S. District Court Judge

26
27
28
2