James Nolan v. Los Angeles City of, et al

Filing 766

PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich, re: Stipulation for Protective Order, 765 . (mz)

Download PDF
James Nolan v. Los Angeles City of, et al Doc. 766 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A Professional Law Corporation 6033 W. Century Boulevard, Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90045 zBrian P. Walter, Bar No. 171429 bwalter@lcwlegal.com Geoffrey S. Sheldon, Bar No. 185560 gsheldon@lcwlegal.com Ingrid B. Cobb, Bar No. 178859 icobb@lcwlegal.com T. Oliver Yee, Bar No. 237057 oyee@lcwlegal.com LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE A Professional Law Corporation 6033 W. Century Boulevard, Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90045 Telephone: (310) 981-2000 Facsimile: (310) 337-0837 Carmen A. Trutanich, City Attorney, Bar No. 86629 Daniel Aguilera, Deputy City Attorney, Bar No. 108159 LOS ANGELES CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 200 North Main Street, Room 700, City Hall East Los Angeles, CA 90012-4131 Telephone: (213) 978-8286 Facsimile: (213) 978-8216 Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF LOS ANGELES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES NOLAN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES and DOES 1 through 10, Defendant. Case No. CV 03-2190 GAF (AJWx) [Assigned to the Honorable Gary A. Feess, Courtroom 740] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Having considered the parties' Stipulation Re: Protective Order for Production of Documents ("Stipulation"), and good cause appearing, the Court orders as follows: 1. That all documents produced by Defendant in discovery, including but [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Dockets.Justia.com not limited to, documents produced and/or identified in Defendant's initial 416449.1 LO160-026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A Professional Law Corporation 6033 W. Century Boulevard, Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90045 disclosures, supplemental disclosures, and responses to Plaintiffs' written discovery requests that contain a third party's private, confidential information, including but not limited to, third parties' names, phone numbers, addresses, social security numbers, arrest information, discipline, wages and similar information, some of which may be protected by California Penal Code sections 832.5 and 832.7, and California Evidence Code section, 1040 et seq., shall be kept strictly confidential and may only be examined by the attorneys for the parties, their agents, employees, consultants, witnesses, court reporters, deponents, the parties themselves, and/or the Court, and only in connection with this subject litigation, and shall not be published to any third parties or used in connection with any other litigation. 2. That in the event that either party uses such documents at trial or for pre-trial motion, or any other motion or filing, the parties may file protected documents so long as all protected information of third parties is redacted. Either party may seek a protective order to place such documents under seal or have them stricken based on failure to redact protected information. 3. After the conclusion of this litigation, the parties will return all documents subject to this Stipulation within 45 calendar days without awaiting the other parties' request. IT IS SO ORDERED. LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: 10/26/10 _________________________________ HONORABLE ANDREW J. WISTRICH Judge of the United States District Court 416449.1 LO160-026 2 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?