Gianni Versace v. Monir M Awada, et al
Filing
1638
JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANTS: Monir M. Awada and Tres Hermanos, Inc., by Judge Gary A. Feess. Judgment is rendered in favor of VERSACE and against Defendants, as to Count V-trademark Infringement and Counterfeiting (15 U.S.C. 1114A(1)); Count VI-False Designation of Origin (15 U.S.C.1125(a)); and Count VII-Trademark Dilution (U.S.C.1125(c)) in the sum of $20,000,000 as to the willful violations related to the Group B goods. Judgment is rendered in favor of VERSACE and against Defendants, as to Count V-Trademark Infringement and Counterfeiting (15 U.S.C.1114(1)); in the sum of $390,000 as to the violations related to the Group A goods. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/1/2012: #1 abstract of judgment) (bp). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/9/2012: #2 abstract of judgment) (bp). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/17/2012: #3 G-97) (bp). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/25/2012: #4 abstract) (bp).
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
BRUCE C. GRIDLEY (SBN 057166
Member of the Firm
KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN
515 So. Figueroa Street – Suite 1850
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: (213) 617-0480
Facsimile: (213) 625-0931
Email: bgridley@kbblaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants, MONIR M. AWADA
and TRES HERMANOS, INC.
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
GIANNI VERSACE, S.p.A. a Foreign
Corporation
_
Case No. CV 03-3254 GAF (RNBx)
_
_
JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANTS:
_
Plaintiff,
_ MONIR M. AWADA
1.
_ TRES HERMANOS, INC.
2.
_
vs.
_
_
MONIR M. AWADA, et al.,
_
MOHAMED BDAIR, an Individual AlI
_
CHAHINE, an Individual GINNO CHAHINE
_
an Individual; MOHAMAD N. CHAHINE, an_
Individual;
NADER
CHAHINE,
an_
Individual' MOUSSA DAANA, an Individual;_
AKIL EL REDA, an individual; ALI_
KHALIL ELREDA, an Individual, FIRAS_
MOHAMMAD FAKIH, an Individual; ALI_
YOUSSEF
FARHAT,
an
Individual;_
HASSAN MOHAMAD FARHAT, an_
Individual; MOHAMAD ALI FARHAT, an_
Individual YOUSSEF M. FARHAT, an._
Individual; ALI ADNAN GHACHAM, an_
Individual; BASSAM ADNAN GHACHAM,_
an
Individual;
TAGRID
ADNAN_
GHACHAM, an Individual; ALI DAOUD_
GHACHAM, an Individual; HUSSEIN_
_
DAOUD GHACHAM, an Individual;
_
MOHAMED GHACHAM, an Individual;_
OSSAMA
DAOUD
GHACHAM,
an_
Individual;
RAMONA
GONZALEZ,
an
1
JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANTS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Individual; MAHMOUD H. HARB, an_
INDIVIDUAL; MAHA ASSAAD JOMAA, _
an Individual; MOUSSA MATAR an
Individual; HUSSEIN MOURAD, an
Individual; SAMIR MOURAD an Individual;
YAMEL MOURAD, an Individual; YOUNG
JIN PARK, an Individual; ABDEL NABI
SAAB, an Individual; ALEX SAAB, an
Individual; ALI HUSSEIN SAAB, an
Individual; ALI NAIM SAAB, an Individual;
ELSA SAAB, an Individual; HASSAN
SAAB, an Individual; HUSSEIN YOUSSEF
SAAB, an Individual; AHMAD M. SAAB, an
Individual; TASHIN SAAB, an Individual;
YOUSEF SAAB, an Individual; AHMED
KHALIL SALEH, an Individual; HUSSEIN
KHALIL
SALEH,
an
Individual;
MAHMOUD
KHALIL
SALEH,
an
Individual; ABBAS SALEH SALEH, an
Individual; ALI SALEH
SALEH, an
Individual; HASSAN SALEH SALEH, an
Individual; HUSSEIN SALEH SALEH, an
Individual; NAJIBE SALEH SALEH, an
Individual; ABBAS MAHMOUD SALEH, an
Individual; ALI SLEIMAN SALEH, an
Individual; HUSSEIN ALI SALEH, an
Individual; MIRIAM S. SALEH, an
Individual; MUSTAPHA ALI SALEH, an
Individual; AHMAD SALIM, an Individual;
IKHLAS SALIM, an Individual; ANA
MARIA SANDOVAL, an Individual; JOSE
G. SANDOVAL, an Individual; ALI M.
TEHFI, an Individual; KHALED TEHFE, an
Individual; NAZIH TEHFE, an Individual;
AMA CASUALS, INC., a California
Corporation; AWADA BROS., INC., a
California
Corporation;
AWADA
BROTHERS, INC., a California Corporation;
THE BRAND NAME CONNECTION, INC.,
a California Corporation; CENSO UNICO.,
INC., a California Corporation; DENIM
PALACE, INC., a California Corporation;
GHACHAM, INC., a California Corporation;
HIP HOP CONNECTIONS, INC., a
California Corporation; JAVINCCI, LLC., a
California Limited Liability Corporation; LA
BRAND NAME, INC., a California
Corporation; LIMITED CLOTHING, INC., a
2
JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANTS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
California Corporation; LOS HERMANOS,
INC., a California Corporation; MAS
SPORTSWEAR,
INC.,
a
California
Corporation; MGM TRADING, INC., a
California
Corporation;
MIRAGE
CONNECTION,
INC.,
a
California
Corporation; NUEVA TIENDA, INC., a
California
Corporation
dba
NUEVA
TIENDA; SAAB & SONS CLOTHING,
INC., a California Corporation; SAAB
GROUP, INC., a California Corporation;
SPORT JEANS, INC., a California
Corporation; TRES HERMANOS INC., a
California Corporation; and UNESCO
JEANS, INC., a California Corporation aka
UNESCO, INC., and DOE 10, unknown
business entity, Inclusive,
Defendants.
_____________________________________
13
WHEREAS, on September 4, 2009, as to Group B goods, the Court granted summary
14
judgment in favor of Gianni Versace S.p.A (“VERSACE”) and against defendants MONIR M.
15
AWADA, an individual,
16
(“Defendants”) as to liability of Defendants for willful trademark infringement and
17
counterfeiting, false designation of origin and unfair competition as to the Registered Marks as
18
follows:
and TRES HERMANOS, INC., a California corporation,
19
1,725,686
20
1,891,546
21
1,875,093
22
2,078,918
23
2,121,984
24
2,387,508
25
2,078,918
26
2,121,984
27
2,426,052
28
3
JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANTS
1
(Docket No. 1503) (Attached as Exhibit 1 and Docket No.1506 attached as Exhibit 2)
2
WHEREAS, on May 5, 2010, following jury trial on the question of damages, the jury
3
verdict awarded in favor of VERSACE and against Defendants statutory damages of
4
$20,000,000 as to Group B goods pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c) (Docket No. 1547).
5
(Attached as Exhibit 3)
6
WHEREAS, on March 2, 2011, as to Group A goods, the Court found for VERSACE
7
and against Defendants as to liability for trademark infringement as to Registered Marks as
8
follows:
9
1,541,272
10
1,641,270
11
1,725,686
12
1,875,093
13
2,121,984
14
2,078,918
15
(Docket No. 1624) (attached as Exhibit 4)
16
WHEREAS, on March 2, 2011 the Court awarded to VERSACE and against
17
Defendants statutory damages of $390,000 as to Group A goods pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §
18
1117(c) (Docket 1624).
19
20
WHEREAS, on March 2, 2011 the Court ruled that the Judgment shall include
injunctive relief in favor of VERSACE and against Defendants (Docket 1624).
21
22
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:
23
1.
Defendants willfully violated Federal Lanham Act as alleged in Count V –
24
Trademark Infringement and Counterfeiting (15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)); Count VI – False
25
Designation of Origin (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)); Count VII - Trademark Dilution (15 U.S.C. §
26
1125(c) and Count IX-State Unfair Competition (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200) as to Group
27
B goods.
28
4
JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANTS
1
2
3
2.
Defendants violated Federal Lanham Act as alleged in Count V – Trademark
Infringement and Counterfeiting (15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)) as to Group A goods.
3.
Defendants and their subsidiaries, related entities, divisions, officers, owners,
4
shareholders, employees, affiliates, servants, representatives, agents, predecessors, assigns and
5
successors in interest of any kind, and all persons, firms, entities, or corporations under their
6
direction and control or in active concert or participation with them, are immediately and
7
permanently enjoined throughout the world from directly or indirectly infringing,
8
counterfeiting, or diluting the VERSACE Trademarks (“Versace trademarks”), which include,
9
but are not limited to, the following:
10
1,541,272
11
1,641,270
12
1,725,686
13
1,875,093
14
1,891,546
15
2,078,918
16
2,381,984
17
2,387,508
18
2,121,984
19
2,426,052
20
on Registry with the United States Patent & Trademark Office, in any manner, including
21
generally, but not limited to manufacturing, importing, distributing, advertising, selling, and/or
22
offering for sale of any merchandise which infringes said trademarks and specifically from:
23
24
25
(a)
Imitating, copying or making unauthorized use of any or all of the
VERSACE trademarks;
(b)
Importing, manufacturing, producing, possessing, distributing, circulating,
26
advertising, promoting, displaying, selling, and/or offering for sale, any non-genuine product
27
bearing any simulation, reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation or reproduces, or
28
utilizes the likenesses of or which copy or are likely to cause consumer confusion with any of
5
JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANTS
1
the VERSACE trademarks or confusingly similar mark or trade name;
2
(c)
Manufacturing, distributing, selling or offering for sale or in connection
3
thereto any unauthorized promotional materials, labels, packaging or containers which picture,
4
reproduce or utilize the likenesses of, or which are likely to cause consumer confusion with any
5
of the VERSACE trademarks;
6
(d)
Using any false designation of origin, false description, including words,
7
symbols, trademark or trade name tending to falsely describe or represent, or is likely to
8
confuse, mislead, or deceive purchasers, Defendants’ customers, or members of the public, that
9
unauthorized merchandise manufactured, distributed, advertised, sold and/or offered for sale by
10
Defendants originate from VERSACE, or that said merchandise has been sponsored,
11
authorized, endorsed, approved, licensed by, associated, or is in any way connected or
12
affiliated with VERSACE;
13
(e)
Transferring, consigning, selling, shipping or otherwise moving any non-
14
genuine VERSACE goods, packaging or other materials in Defendants’ possession, custody or
15
control bearing a design, or mark substantially identical to or confusingly similar with or any or
16
all of the VERSACE trademarks or trade dress;
17
18
(f)
VERSACE’s goodwill, reputation and business;
19
20
Diluting and infringing the VERSACE trademarks and damaging
(g)
Otherwise unfairly competing with VERSACE, or its subsidiaries or
affiliated companies;
21
(h)
Passing off or selling any products which are entirely genuine VERSACE
22
products as and for VERSACE products, including products utilizing VERSACE labels,
23
packaging or containers that have been in any way modified without the written permission of
24
VERSACE;
25
(i)
Applying to the United States Patent & Trademark Office for the
26
registration of any trademark that is a colorable imitation of any or all of the VERSACE
27
trademarks, or confusingly similar mark or trade name;
28
(j)
Using the VERSACE trademarks or any such reproduction, counterfeit,
6
JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANTS
1
copy, or colorable imitation in connection with the manufacture, importation, distribution,
2
advertising, publicity, sale and/or offering for sale, of any other merchandise not referred to
3
above; and
4
5
6
(k)
Instructing, assisting, inducing, aiding or abetting any other person or
business entity in engaging in or performing any of the activities referred to above.
4.
The jurisdiction of this Court is retained for the purpose of making any further
7
orders necessary or proper for the construction or modification of the Judgment, the
8
enforcement thereof and the punishment of any violations thereof.
9
5.
Judgment is rendered in favor of VERSACE and against Defendants, as to Count
10
V – Trademark Infringement and Counterfeiting (15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)); Count VI – False
11
Designation of Origin (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)); and Count VII - Trademark Dilution (15 U.S.C.
12
§ 1125(c)) in the sum of $20,000,000 as to the willful violations related to the Group B goods.
13
6.
Judgment is rendered in favor of VERSACE and against Defendants, as to Count
14
V – Trademark Infringement and Counterfeiting (15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)); in the sum of $390,000
15
as to the violations related to the Group A goods.
16
17
18
7.
All other claims and causes of action as between VERSACE and MONIR M.
AWADA and TRES HERMANOS, INC., are dismissed with prejudice.
8.
All counterfeit and infringing VERSACE products currently in the possession,
19
custody or control of Defendants, their parents, subsidiaries, related entities, divisions, officers,
20
owners, shareholders, employees, affiliates, servants, representatives, agents, predecessors,
21
assigns and successors in interest of any kind, and all persons, firms, entities, or corporations
22
under their direction and control or in active concert or participation with them, shall be turned
23
over to counsel for Plaintiff within ten (10) business days of this Order and destroyed under the
24
direction of VERSACE.
25
26
27
28
7
JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANTS
1
2
9.
All counterfeit and infringing VERSACE products seized in this action by
VERSACE from Defendants shall be destroyed under the direction of VERSACE.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED
4
DATED: August 29, 2011
5
6
7
Hon. Gary A. Feess
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8
JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANTS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?