Garden City Boxing v. Patricia Diaz
Filing
33
RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Creative Recovery Concepts Inc, Garden City Boxing Club, Inc. and against Patricia Diaz, individually and dba Mariscos Veracruz in the principal amount of $30,068.00, interest in the amount of $7,49 6.38, attorneys fees of $0.00, costs of $0.00 for a total judgment of $37,564.38. Related to: APPLICATION for Renewal of Judgment re Default Judgment 31 and Default Judgment 28 (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Renewal by Clerk Issued (FOUO)) (jre)
1
2
?
4
ERANKLIN J. LOVE, Bar #80334
LAW OEFICE OF FRANKLIN J. LOVE
800 S. Barranca Ave., Ste.
1-00
Covina, California 9L723
(626) 653-04 ss
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COI'RT
CENTRJAI DISTRICT OF CAIIFORNIA
q
A
7
8
GARDEN
CITY BOXING CLUB, INC.
) *=r*rn* oF DEEA. T.T ,ruDcMENT
)
.LERK
""
Plainti ff,
10
vs.
11
13
CASE NO.CVO3-68588R (P.'}TX)
)
9
72
)
)
individuallY
and dba MARISCOS VERACRUZ,
PATRICIA DIAZ,
)
)
)
T4
Defendant
)
)
15
)
16
)
Based upon
L'7
18
19
20
the Application for Renewal of Judgment of the
original judgment, and pursuant to F.R.C.P. 59 (a) and C.C.P639.1-10
through 683.320 and good cause appearing, therefore:
2L
The default judgment entered on January L9, 2005
22
23
against defendants, PATRICIA DLAZ, individually
and dba
24
MARISCOS \IERACRUZ,
)q
26
2'7
2B
Page
1 of
2
REIIEWAI OF DEFAT'I,T JI'DGMENT
Case No. CV-03-5858-ER (P,lVlx)
is hereby renewed on the amounts set forth:
RENE}IAI OF MONEY iII'DGMENT
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
10
Total- j udgment
Costs after judgment
Attorney fees
Subtotal- (add a thru c)
Credits after Judgment
Subtotal (substract e from
Interest after judgment
Eee for filing renewa1
Total renewed judgrment
$30,068.00
0. 00
0. 00
30,068.00
0. 00
d)
30,068.00
7
,49 6. 38
0.00
$37,564 .38
11
L2
13
t4
DATED:
1/12/2015
Clerk by
J. Remigio, Deputy Clerk
1E
15
L7
l8
19
20
2t
22
23
24
10
27
28
aqe2of2
RENEWAI OF DEEAULT ,JUDGMENT
Case No. CV-03-6858-ER (P,IWx)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?