Directv Inc v. Guadalupe Arambula et al
Filing
24
RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT by Clerk of Court, in favor of Directv Inc against Guadalupe Arambula. Total Judgment for $217,800.00, Credits after Judgment of $78,755.41, Subtotal of $139,044.59, Interest after Judgment of $43,610.68, Total Renewed Judgment of $182,655.27. Related to: Default Judgment, Permanent Injunction 14 , APPLICATION for Renewal of Judgment 23 . (bm)
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Michael E. Williams (Bar No. 181299)
michaelwilliams@quinnemanuel.com
865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017-2543
Telephone:
(213) 443-3000
Facsimile:
(213) 443-3100
Issued Ntc of Renewal to Plaintiff
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DIRECTV, LLC f/k/a DIRECTV, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DIRECTV, INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CASE NO. CV 04-551-ABC (RMCx)
RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT
Trial Date:
None Set
GUADALUPE ARAMBULA, AND JOHN
DOES 1 -10,
Defendant.
00235.20319/5929660.1
RENEWED JUDGMENT (PROPOSED)
1
Pursuant to Rule 69(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Article 2 of the
2 California Code of Civil Procedure, the above named Plaintiff, by its attorney, applies for renewal
3 of judgment against Defendant GUADALUPE ARAMBULA.
4
The original judgment was entered on June 2, 2004. A true and correct copy is attached as
5 Exhibit “1”.
6
The judgment has not been previously renewed.
7
Total Judgment:
$217,800.00
8
Credits after Judgment:
$ 78,755.41
9
Subtotal:
$139,044.59
10
Interest after Judgment:
$ 43,610.68
11
Total Renewed Judgment:
$182,655.27
12
Renewed Judgment to accrue interest at the legal rate until paid.
13
14 DATED: May 27, 2014
15
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
16
By /s/ Michael Williams
Michael E. Williams
Attorneys for Plaintiff
17
18
19
20
21
DATED: May 27, 2014
By
By
DEPUTY CLERK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
00235.20319/5929660.1
-2RENEWED JUDGMENT (PROPOSED)
EXHIBIT 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?