United States of America v. Roy M Prendergast et al

Filing 70

JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT LINDA PRENDERGAST; GRANTING STIPULATION BETWEEN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND DEFENDANT LINDA PENDERGAST by Judge Margaret M. Morrow, in favor of United States of America against Linda F Prendergast (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney SANDRA R. BROWN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division VALERIE L. MAKAREWICZ Assistant United States Attorney SBN 229637 Room 7211, Federal Building 300 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-2729 Facsimile: (213) 894-0115 Email: valerie.makarewicz@usdoj.gov E-FILED 02.24.12 JS-6 8 Attorneys for United States of America 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 WESTERN DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ROY M. PRENDERGAST; et. al. ) ) Defendants ) ) ) ________________________________) Case No. 04-2646 MMM (MANx) [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT LINDA PRENDERGAST; ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION BETWEEN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND DEFENDANT LINDA PRENDERGAST 20 21 Based on the Stipulation between the United States of 22 America and defendant Linda Prendergast, and for good cause 23 appearing therefor, 24 IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: 25 1) Judgement is entered against defendant Linda 26 Prendergast in favor of the United States in the amount of 27 $155,000, plus interest payable from the date of entry of 28 judgment at the legal rate as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1961 that 1 1 will accrue until the judgment is paid in full; said judgment 2 will be in rem against the subject real property located in 3 Northridge, California, County of Los Angeles, and legally 4 described as the following: 5 Lot 22 of Tract 21653 as per Map recorded in Book 577 6 Pages 42 to 44 inclusive of Maps, in the office of the 7 County Recorder of said county. 8 Number 2686-013-012. 9 2) Assessor’s Parcel No part of the aforementioned judgment shall be 10 required to be paid until the earlier of the following events: a) 11 the death of defendant Linda Prendergast, or b) the sale by 12 defendant Linda Prendergast of the subject real property; 13 3) Defendant Linda Prendergast agrees to maintain the 14 subject real property in a habitable condition and not let the 15 condition of the property deteriorate, pay all property taxes and 16 loans secured by the subject real property, and maintain adequate 17 home-owners insurance to protect the subject real property; 18 4) The IRS agrees to subordinate its judgment as 19 referenced in paragraph 1, above, to a home equity line to be 20 obtained by defendant Linda Prendergast at a future date in an 21 amount not to exceed $30,000; 22 5) Brager Tax Law Group, and Dennis Brager, the firm and 23 attorney who represent defendant Linda Prendergast, agree to 24 subordinate their attorneys’ liens against the subject real 25 property, to the judgment of the United States as referenced in 26 paragraph 1, above; 27 28 6) IRS agrees to withdraw any Notices of Federal Tax Lien filed against Linda Prendergast that are the subject of the 2 1 2 3 4 instant lawsuit; 7) IRS agrees to abate any liabilities against defendant Linda Prendergast that are the subject of the instant lawsuit; 8) In the event that defendant Roy Prendergast – who will 5 be subject to the entirety of the pending default judgment- took 6 action to enforce and collect on his property interests under the 7 divorce decree entered on December 7, 2001, defendant Linda 8 Prendergast agrees to notify the IRS, so it may collect any 9 outstanding liabilities from defendant Roy Prendergast in such 10 action; 11 9) With respect to the default judgment entered by the 12 Court on January 4, 2012 against defendant Roy M. Prendergast for 13 his outstanding income tax liabilities for taxable years 1994 14 through 2000, inclusive, in the total amount of $213,096.94, plus 15 any penalties and statutory interest accruing on such amount 16 after July 1, 2011, the parties to this stipulation agree that in 17 the event that the United States collects any payment(s) on said 18 default judgment for tax years 1994 through 2000, inclusive, the 19 parties agree that the payment(s) collected shall be a credit in 20 the same amount applied to also reduce the judgment agreed to by 21 the parties in this stipulation against defendant Linda 22 Prendergast, as stipulated by the parties; and 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 1 10) Any discharge or elimination of the default judgment of 2 defendant Roy M. Prendergast in a bankruptcy proceeding, or any 3 other preceding, legal or otherwise, shall not effect the 4 judgment agreed to by the parties as referenced in paragraph 1, 5 above, against defendant Linda Prendergast. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 DATED: February 24, 2012 ____________________________ MARGARET M. MORROW United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 Respectfully submitted 12 ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney SANDRA R. BROWN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division 13 14 15 16 _____/S______________________ VALERIE MAKAREWICZ Assistant United States Attorney 17 18 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?