Tag-It Pacific Inc v. Pro-Fit Holdings Limited

Filing 271

ORDER DISMISSING ALL CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE by Judge A. Howard Matz, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 270 . PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the Court Orders as follows: the claims and counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs of this action and attorneys' fees. (kbr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 13 lawyers los angeles, california McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C. 12 TAG-IT PACIFIC, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 PRO-FIT HOLDINGS LIMITED, a company registered in England, 16 Defendant. 17 18 PRO-FIT HOLDINGS LIMITED, a company registered in England, 19 Counterclaimant, 20 vs. 21 22 TAG-IT PACIFIC, INC., a Delaware corporation, 23 Counterdefendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 04-2694 AHM (RCx) ORDER DISMISSING ALL CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE 24 25 26 27 28 CV 04-2694 AHM (RCx) ORDER DISMISSMING ALL CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE 1795845 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the Court Orders as follows: the claims and 2 counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs of this 3 action and attorneys’ fees. 4 5 6 DATED: March 29, 2012 ______________________________________ The Honorable A. Howard Matz _ United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CV 04-2694 AHM (RCx) 1795845 -1PROOF OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?