Tag-It Pacific Inc v. Pro-Fit Holdings Limited
Filing
271
ORDER DISMISSING ALL CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE by Judge A. Howard Matz, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 270 . PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the Court Orders as follows: the claims and counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs of this action and attorneys' fees. (kbr)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
13
lawyers
los angeles, california
McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C.
12
TAG-IT PACIFIC, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
PRO-FIT HOLDINGS LIMITED, a
company registered in England,
16
Defendant.
17
18
PRO-FIT HOLDINGS LIMITED, a
company registered in England,
19
Counterclaimant,
20
vs.
21
22
TAG-IT PACIFIC, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
23
Counterdefendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 04-2694 AHM (RCx)
ORDER DISMISSING ALL CLAIMS
AND COUNTERCLAIMS WITH
PREJUDICE
24
25
26
27
28
CV 04-2694 AHM (RCx)
ORDER DISMISSMING ALL CLAIMS AND
COUNTERCLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE
1795845
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the Court Orders as follows: the claims and
2
counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs of this
3
action and attorneys’ fees.
4
5
6
DATED: March 29, 2012
______________________________________
The Honorable A. Howard Matz
_
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CV 04-2694 AHM (RCx)
1795845
-1PROOF OF SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?