Michael Lamont Jones v. Jill Brown

Filing 89

ORDER RE: BITTAKERPROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 CASE NO. CV 04-02748 ODW 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 19 Pursuant to Bittaker v. Woodford, 331 F.3d 715 (9th Cir. 2003), this 20 Court enters the following Protective Order regarding: (1) documents and 21 materials, including declarations, derived from the trial team or trial counsel files 22 that Petitioner provides to Respondent during this habeas action; and (2) any 23 reference to such documents or testimony in the parties' pleadings submitted to this 24 Court. MICHAEL LAMONT JONES, 13 Petitioner, 14 v. 15 16 MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin, 17 25 Respondent. 1. DEATH PENALTY CASE ORDER RE: BITTAKER PROTECTIVE ORDER (Docket No. 68) To the extent that the Court will order the production of documents 26 and discovery in this matter that Petitioner contends are subject to claims of 27 privilege or protected from disclosure by the attorney work-product doctrine, and 28 1 1 to the extent that this Court will order Petitioner's trial counsel's file, including the 2 files of other defense team members, be produced to the Respondent, or Petitioner 3 turns over such documents voluntarily, such materials shall be subject to this 4 Protective Order and shall remain confidential and shall not be disclosed except as 5 set forth herein. 6 2. Further, to the extent that this Court will order the taking of the 7 depositions of trial counsel, other members of the defense team, Petitioner, and 8 Petitioner's experts, such testimony disclosing attorney-client communications or 9 work product shall be subject to this Protective Order and shall remain confidential 10 11 and, shall not be disclosed except as set forth herein. 3. The appropriateness of any measures to prevent the disclosure of the 12 contents of materials subject to this Protective Order in connection with presenting 13 evidence at any evidentiary hearing in this case will be separately addressed by the 14 Court in connection with conducting any such hearing. 15 4. To the extent that either party intends to file all or any part of the 16 material referenced herein as supporting evidence in this action, the party shall 17 move the Court for an order to file such materials under seal, demonstrating with 18 specificity, the need for the under seal filing. 19 5. All privileged documents and testimony subject to this Protective 20 Order and produced to Respondent in this action may be used only for purposes of 21 litigating this habeas corpus proceeding by: a) Petitioner and the members of the 22 legal team, i.e., lawyers, paralegals, investigators, and support staff, assigned to 23 Jones v. Martel by the Office of the Federal Public Defender, and persons retained 24 by Petitioner's counsel to litigate this matter, including, but not limited to, outside 25 investigators, consultants and expert witnesses; and (b) Respondent and the 26 members of the legal team, i.e., lawyers, paralegals, investigators, and support 27 28 2 1 staff, assigned to Jones v. Martel by the California Department of Justice, Attorney 2 General's Office, and persons retained by Respondent's counsel to litigate this 3 matter, including, but not limited to, outside investigators, consultants and expert 4 witnesses. This Protective Order extends to members of the legal teams and all 5 persons retained by the parties to litigate this matter. All such individuals shall be 6 provided with a copy of this Protective Order. 7 6. Except for disclosure to the persons and agencies described in 8 Paragraph 5, disclosure of the contents of the documents and testimony protected 9 by this Protective Order and the documents and testimony themselves that are 10 protected by this Protective Order shall not be made to any other persons or 11 agencies, including, but not limited to, prosecutorial agencies and law enforcement 12 personnel, without the Court's order. If Respondent contends that he needs to 13 disclose materials protected by this Protective Order to outside prosecutorial 14 agencies, outside law enforcement personnel, experts, consultants, deponents or 15 witnesses in order to investigate or respond to Petitioner's habeas claims, 16 Respondent shall provide to Petitioner's counsel (a) the identity of the individual/s 17 to whom access is going to be provided, and (b) Respondent's reasons therefor. 18 Petitioner shall notify Respondent within three court days of his non-opposition or 19 objection to Respondent's proposal. If Petitioner objects to Respondent's proposal, 20 and if the parties cannot resolve their differences within three additional court 21 days, Petitioner shall provide his written objection to Respondent within three 22 further court days. Respondent shall file and serve a document containing 23 Petitioner's objections and Respondent's responses within three additional court 24 days. The Court shall rule on Petitioner's objections before the privileged materials 25 are disclosed. Any person obtaining access to the privileged material pursuant to 26 this process shall also be given a copy of this Protective Order 27 28 3 1 2 and shall sign a statement agreeing to be bound by its terms. 7. Documents and testimony that Petitioner contends are privileged shall 3 be clearly designated as such by labeling the documents or testimony in a manner 4 that does not prevent reading the text of the document. 5 8. All documents and testimony designated as privileged by Petitioner 6 that are submitted to this Court shall be submitted under seal in a manner reflecting 7 their confidential nature and designed to ensure that the privileged material will not 8 become part of the public record. Any pleading, deposition transcript, discovery 9 response or request, or other papers served on opposing counsel or filed or lodged 10 with the court that contains or reveals the substantive content of the privileged 11 matter shall be filed under seal, and shall include a separate caption page that 12 includes the following Confidentiality Notice or its equivalent: 13 TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL 14 THIS PLEADING OR DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL 15 INFORMATION SUBJECT TO A PROTECTIVE ORDER AND IS NOT TO 16 BE OPENED NOR ITS CONTENTS DISPLAYED OR DISCLOSED 17 9. If privileged documents or documents containing privileged matters 18 are filed with this Court, they shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court in sealed 19 envelopes prominently marked with the caption of the case and the foregoing 20 Confidentiality Notice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to maintain the 21 confidentiality of any documents filed in accordance with the above. Insofar as 22 reasonably feasible, only confidential portions of the filings shall be under seal; 23 and the parties shall narrowly tailor their documents to limit, as much as is 24 practicable, the quantity of material that is to be filed under seal. When a pleading 25 or document contains only a limited amount of privileged content, a party may file 26 a complete copy under seal and at the same time file on the public record 27 28 4 1 an additional, redacted version of the document, blocking out the limited matter 2 comprising the confidential portions. 3 10. No later than sixty days after the filing of this Protective Order, 4 Petitioner shall identify any previously filed or lodged pleading, order, 5 declaration, transcript or other document, or any part thereof, that contains or 6 discloses the substance or content of privileged matter. For each such item, 7 following consultations with Respondent, Petitioner shall file a Redacted Version 8 of the item, blocking out the privileged matter, and for each such originally filed 9 item, Petitioner shall supply the clerk with a "To Be Filed Under Seal" caption 10 page and envelope that conform to the Privileged Caption, and the clerk shall insert 11 the filed or lodged item in the envelope, seal the item and re-file it. 12 11. Petitioner's disclosure of documents from trial counsel's file in this 13 action, and any related testimony by Petitioner or members of Petitioner's trial 14 team at a deposition in this case, does not constitute a waiver of Petitioner's rights 15 under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution in the 16 event of any retrial. 17 12. This order shall continue in effect after the conclusion of the habeas 18 corpus proceedings and specifically shall apply in the event of a retrial of all or any 19 portion of Petitioner's criminal case. Any modification or vacation of this order 20 shall be made upon notice and an opportunity to be heard from both parties. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 25, 2012. 23 24 25 ___________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?