David K Gottlieb v. Steven Hicks et al

Filing 450

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION by Judge James V. Selna, Pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation 449 Between David K. Gottlieb And Coudert Brothers LLP/Development Specialists, Inc. For Dismissal of Action, (the Stipulation) and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Stipulation 449 is approved and the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (rla)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STEIN & LUBIN LLP Manuel A. Martinez (SBN 115075) Dennis D. Miller (SBN 138669) 600 Montgomery Street, 14th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 981-0550 Facsimile: (415) 981-4343 mmartinez@steinlubin.com dmiller@steinlubin.com Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant and Counter-Claimant COUDERT BROTHERS LLP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION LOS ANGELES DAVID K. GOTTLIEB, in his capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee for the INTERNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC HOSPITAL FOUNDATION fdba Granada Hills Community Hospital, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN HICKS, et al., Defendants. AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS AND THIRD PARTY CLAIMS JS-6 Case No. CV 04-07318-JVS-SS ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION Pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation Between David K. Gottlieb And Coudert Brothers LLP/Development Specialists, Inc. For Dismissal of Action, (the "Stipulation") and good cause appearing therefor, 23510003/394205v1 1 ORDER RE DISMISSAL Case No. CV 04-07318-JVS-SS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Stipulation is approved and the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). August 14, 2009 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 23510003/394205v1 2 ORDER RE DISMISSAL Case No. CV 04-07318-JVS-SS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?