Log Cabin Republicans v. United States of America et al
Filing
207
Index of Plaintiff's Deposition Designations and Defendants' Counter-Designations and Objections Thereto filed by Plaintiff Log Cabin Republicans, Defendants Donald H Rumsfeld, United States of America (Woods, Daniel)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DAN WOODS (State Bar No. 78638) EARLE MILLER (State Bar No. 116864) AARON KAHN (State Bar No. 238505) WHITE & CASE LLP 633 W. Fifth Street, Suite 1900 Los Angeles, CA 90071-2007 Telephone: (213) 620-7700 Facsimile: (213) 452-2329 Email: dwoods@whitecase.com Email: emiller@whitecase.com Email: aakahn@whitecase.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Log Cabin Republicans UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. CV04-8425 VAP (Ex) INDEX OF PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND DEFENDANTS' COUNTERDESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO Judge: Hon. Virginia A. Phillips
LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROBERT M. GATES (substituted for Donald H. Rumsfeld pursuant to FRCP 25(d)), SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, in his official capacity, Defendants.
Complaint filed: October 12, 2004 Trial Date: July 13, 2010 Pretrial Conf: June 28, 2010 2:30 p.m.
LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)
INDEX OF PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND DEFENDANTS' COUNTER-DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
In accordance with Central District Local Rule 16-2.7, the parties hereby submit an index of deposition designations and counter-designations and objections thereto. Defendants' designations below are submitted only as counter-designations to Plaintiff's designations. In addition to the objections reflected in the table below, Defendants object to all depositions submitted as evidence at trial, in their entirety, on the ground that no evidence outside the legislative record is appropriate in a facial challenge to a statute. Dated: June 28, 2010 WHITE & CASE LLP /s/ Dan Woods Dan Woods Attorneys for Plaintiff Log Cabin Republicans UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CIVIL DIVISION, FEDERAL PROGRAMS BRANCH By: /s/ W. Scott Simpson W. Scott Simpson Attorneys for Defendants United States of America and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity By:
-1LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)
INDEX OF PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND DEFENDANTS' COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Designations From 6:1 6:9 7:14 7:19 8:21 9:21 10:3 12:14 20:14 21:10 22:12 23:7 26:18 27:2 27:15 28:15 29:7 29:10 30:8 30:22 31: 4 31:11 31:17 31:22 33:3 33:16 34:1 34:8 34:13 36:6 36:8 37:2 44:3 44:21 45:14 55:13 55:21 56: 8 59:12 59: 16 60: 2 61:3 65: 1 66: 1 66:12
Deposition Designations of Jamie Scott Brady
Party (P/D) D P D P P D P D P D P P D P D P D P P D P D P D P D P D P P D P D P D P D P D P P D P P D Objections
To 6:6 7:13 7:18 8:14 9:20 10:2 12:13 20:13 21:9 22:6 23:6 26:17 27:1 27:14 28:14 29:6 29:9 30:5 30:21 31:3 31:10 31:16 31:21 33:2 33:15 33:22 34:7 34:12 36:5 36:7 37:1 44:2 44:20 45:13 55:12 55:20 56:7 59:11 59:15 59:22 61:2 64:22 65:22 66:11 67:15
21:3-9 Irrelevant Irrelevant Irrelevant
28:22-29:6 Irrelevant Irrelevant
Irrelevant Irrelevant
Irrelevant Irrelevant 37:2-39:4; 39:12-40:5; 40:22-44:2 Irrelevant
59:6-11 Vague
-2LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)
INDEX OF PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND DEFENDANTS' COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Deposition Designations of Jamie Scott Brady (Continued)
Designations From 67:16 68:3 71:15 72:2 83:12 89:14 95:14 96:8 104:17 105:17 106:3 107:9 108:18 109:5 126:12 128:22 131:19 133:22 138:6 152:17 153:5 154:9 192:7 192:14 193:1 193:22 194:2 195:2 201:17 203:21 206:6 206:17 207:15 208:11 209:9 210:8 211:4 211:22 215:3 221:13 226:11 226:16 228:7 228:22 To 68:2 71:14 72:1 83:11 89:13 95:13 96:7 104:16 105:16 106:2 107:8 108:17 109:4 126:11 128:21 131:18 133:21 138:5 152:16 152:21 154:8 192:6 192:13 192:22 193:21 194:1 195:1 201:16 203:20 206:5 206:16 207:14 208:10 209:8 210:7 211:3 211:21 215:2 221:10 226:10 226:15 228:6 228:21 235:3 Party (P/D) P D P D P D P D P D P D P D P D P D P P P D P D P D P D P D P D P D P D P D P P D P D P Objections
83:12-84:14 Irrelevant Irrelevant Irrelevant Irrelevant
138:18-152:16 Irrelevant Irrelevant 153:5-11 Vague
194:18-195:1 Calls for speculation, lack of foundation, vague
Irrelevant 209:9-18 Irrelevant
220:7-17 Irrelevant, vague 226:16-227:14 Irrelevant 227:20-228:6 Irrelevant, calls for speculation, lack of foundation 230:17-22 Vague 232:2-19; 234:4-235:3 Irrelevant
-3LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)
INDEX OF PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND DEFENDANTS' COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// ///
Deposition Designations of Jamie Scott Brady (Continued)
Designations From 235:4 235:18 240:7 243:13 245:21 246:9 253:10 253:19 To 235:17 240:6 243:12 245:20 246:8 253:9 253:18 260:18 Party (P/D) D P D P D P D P Objections
243:22-245:12 Irrelevant 248:22-253:9 Irrelevant 250:1-14 Vague 253:19-260:18 Irrelevant 255:14-21 Vague 259:6-14 Calls for speculation, lack of foundation 259:16-19 Lack of foundation 259:20-260:6 Vague
262:20 263:17 265:18 266:15
263:12 265:16 266:12 268:9
D D D D
-4LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)
INDEX OF PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND DEFENDANTS' COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
/// /// /// 39:6 39:17 52:10 53:7 56:6 56:8 58:2 61:1 62:2 62:11 63:16 64:8 65:1 67:14 68:14 68:11
Deposition Designations of Dennis Drogo In addition to the objections reflected in the table below, Defendants object that the entire deposition of Dennis Drogo is irrelevant.
Designations From 6:2 11:4 12:12 20:7 To 11:3 12:11 20:5 39:5 Party (P/D) P D P P Objections
39:16 52:9 53:6 56:5 56:7 58:1 60:22 62:1 62:10 63:15 64:7 64:22 67:6 68:10 70:21 68:13
D P D P D P D P D P D P D P P D
20:7-19 Argumentative, calls for speculation 21:5-18 Calls for speculation 33:12-34:6 Asked and answered 36:15-20 Vague 38:1-11 Argumentative
Calls for speculation 56:17-57:3 Vague
70:15-21 Calls for speculation
-5LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)
INDEX OF PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND DEFENDANTS' COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Deposition Designations of Paul Gade In addition to the objections reflected in the table below, Defendants object that the entire deposition of Paul Gade is irrelevant.
Designations From 6:1 91:6 94:1 To 91:5 93:22 118:18 Party (P/D) P D P Objections
99:2-20 Vague 101:4-102:13 Vague, lack of foundation 114:1-8 Lack of foundation
Deposition Designation of Robert MacCoun Defendants object to the admission of the Deposition of Robert MacCoun into evidence, on the basis that Plaintiff has not justified submitting the testimony of Robert MacCoun by deposition.
Designations From 6:2 To 182:5 Party (P/D) P Objections
-6LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)
INDEX OF PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND DEFENDANTS' COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?