Log Cabin Republicans v. United States of America et al

Filing 214

AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Plaintiff Log Cabin Republicans, Defendants Donald H Rumsfeld, United States of America. Amendment to Miscellaneous Document #207 Amended Index of Plaintiff's Deposition Designations and Defendants' Counter-Designations and Objections Thereto (Woods, Daniel)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DAN WOODS (State Bar No. 78638) EARLE MILLER (State Bar No. 116864) AARON KAHN (State Bar No. 238505) WHITE & CASE LLP 633 W. Fifth Street, Suite 1900 Los Angeles, CA 90071-2007 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff Log Cabin Republicans UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. CV04-8425 VAP (Ex) AMENDED INDEX OF PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND DEFENDANTS' COUNTERDESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO Judge: Hon. Virginia A. Phillips

LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROBERT M. GATES (substituted for Donald H. Rumsfeld pursuant to FRCP 25(d)), SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, in his official capacity, Defendants.

Complaint filed: October 12, 2004 Trial Date: July 13, 2010 Pretrial Conf: June 28, 2010 2:30 p.m.

LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)

AMENDED INDEX OF PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND DEFENDANTS' COUNTER-DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

In accordance with Central District Local Rule 16-2.7, the parties hereby submit an amended index of deposition designations and counter-designations and objections thereto. Defendants' designations below are submitted only as counterdesignations to Plaintiff's designations. In addition to the objections reflected in the table below, Defendants object to all depositions submitted as evidence at trial, in their entirety, on the ground that no evidence outside the legislative record is appropriate in a facial challenge to a statute. Dated: July 9, 2010 WHITE & CASE LLP /s/ Dan Woods Dan Woods Attorneys for Plaintiff Log Cabin Republicans UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CIVIL DIVISION, FEDERAL PROGRAMS BRANCH By: /s/ W. Scott Simpson W. Scott Simpson Attorneys for Defendants United States of America and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity By:

-1LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)

AMENDED INDEX OF PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND DEFENDANTS' COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Designations From 6:1 6:9 7:14 7:19 8:21 9:21 10:3 12:14 20:14 21:10 22:7 22:12 23:7 26:18 27:2 27:15 28:15 29:7 29:10 30:8 30:22 31:4 31:11 31:17 31:22 33:3 33:16 34:1 34:8 34:13 36:6 36:8 37:2 44:3 44:21 45:14 55:13 55:21 56:8 59:12 59:16 60:2 61:3 65:1 66:1 66:12

Deposition Designations of Jamie Scott Brady
Party (P/D) D P D P P D P D P D P P P D P D P D P P D P D P D P D P D P P D P D P D P D P D P P D P P D Objections

To 6:6 7:13 7:18 8:14 9:20 10:2 12:13 20:13 21:9 22:6 22:11 23:6 26:17 27:1 27:14 28:14 29:6 29:9 30:5 30:21 31:3 31:10 31:16 31:21 33:2 33:15 33:22 34:7 34:12 36:5 36:7 37:1 44:2 44:20 45:13 55:12 55:20 56:7 59:11 59:15 59:22 61:2 64:22 65:22 66:11 67:15

21:3-9 Irrelevant Irrelevant Irrelevant

28:22-29:6 Irrelevant Irrelevant

Irrelevant Irrelevant

Irrelevant Irrelevant 37:2-39:4; 39:12-40:5; 40:22-44:2 Irrelevant 53:7-54:13 Irrelevant 59:6-11 Vague

-2LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)

AMENDED INDEX OF PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND DEFENDANTS' COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Deposition Designations of Jamie Scott Brady (Continued)
Designations From 67:16 68:3 71:15 72:2 83:12 89:14 95:14 96:8 98:15 104:17 105:17 106:3 107:9 108:18 109:5 126:12 128:22 131:19 133:22 138:6 152:17 153:5 154:9 169:21 192:7 192:14 193:1 193:22 194:2 195:2 201:17 203:21 206:6 206:17 207:15 208:11 209:9 210:8 211:4 211:22 215:3 221:13 226:11 226:16 228:7 To 68:2 71:14 72:1 83:11 89:13 95:13 96:7 97:17 104:16 105:16 106:2 107:8 108:17 109:4 126:11 128:21 131:18 133:21 138:5 152:16 152:21 154:8 166:5 192:6 192:13 192:22 193:21 194:1 195:1 201:16 203:20 206:5 206:16 207:14 208:10 209:8 210:7 211:3 211:21 215:2 221:10 226:10 226:15 228:6 228:21 Party (P/D) P D P D P D P D D P D P D P D P D P D P P P D D P D P D P D P D P D P D P D P D P P D P D Objections

83:12-84:14 Irrelevant 92:10-93:12 Irrelevant Irrelevant 97:9-97:17 Irrelevant Irrelevant Irrelevant

137:4-138:4 Irrelevant 138:18-152:16 Irrelevant Irrelevant 153:5-11 Vague 170:9-173:6; 175:15-183:6 Irrelevant

194:18-195:1 Calls for speculation, lack of foundation, vague

Irrelevant 209:9-18 Irrelevant

220:7-17 Irrelevant, vague 226:11-15 Irrelevant 226:16-227:14 Irrelevant 227:20-228:6 Irrelevant, calls for speculation, lack of foundation

-3LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)

AMENDED INDEX OF PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND DEFENDANTS' COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// ///

Deposition Designations of Jamie Scott Brady (Continued)
Designations From 228:22 235:4 235:18 240:7 243:13 245:21 246:9 258:7 To 235:3 235:17 240:6 243:12 245:20 246:8 248:21 260:18 Party (P/D) P D P D P D P P Objections 230:17-22 Vague 232:2-19; 234:4-235:3 Irrelevant

243:22-245:12 Irrelevant 259:6-14 Calls for speculation, lack of foundation 259:16-19 Lack of foundation 259:20-260:6 Vague 262:21-263:12 Speculation, an incomplete hypothetical question 265:12-16 Leading 265:18: Leading

262:20 263:17 265:18 266:15 268:11

263:12 265:16 266:12 268:9 273:22

D D D D P

-4LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)

AMENDED INDEX OF PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND DEFENDANTS' COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
/// /// /// 39:6 39:17 53:7 55:19 56:6 56:8 58:2 61:1 62:2 62:11 63:16 64:8 65:1 67:14 68:14 68:11

Deposition Designations of Dennis Drogo In addition to the objections reflected in the table below, Defendants object that the entire deposition of Dennis Drogo is irrelevant.
Designations From 6:2 11:4 12:12 20:7 To 11:3 12:11 20:5 39:5 Party (P/D) P D P P Objections

39:16 52:9 55:3 56:5 56:7 58:1 60:22 62:1 62:10 63:15 64:7 64:22 67:6 68:10 70:21 68:13

D P P P D P D P D P D P D P P D

20:7-19 Argumentative, calls for speculation 21:5-18 Calls for speculation 33:12-34:6 Asked and answered 36:15-20 Vague 38:1-11 Argumentative Calls for speculation Calls for speculation 56:17-57:3 Vague

70:15-21 Calls for speculation

-5LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)

AMENDED INDEX OF PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND DEFENDANTS' COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Deposition Designations of Paul Gade In addition to the objections reflected in the table below, Defendants object that the entire deposition of Paul Gade is irrelevant.
Designations From 6:1 91:6 94:1 To 91:5 93:22 118:18 Party (P/D) P D P Objections

99:2-20 Vague 101:4-102:13 Vague, lack of foundation 114:1-8 Lack of foundation

-6LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)

AMENDED INDEX OF PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND DEFENDANTS' COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO