Log Cabin Republicans v. United States of America et al

Filing 255

Civil Appeals Docketing Statement received from forwarded to 9th CCA. RE: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #254 (Gardner, Joshua)

CLEAR FORM

Form 6. Civil Appeals Docketing Statement

USCA DOCKET # (IF KNOWN)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT
PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NECESSARY. TITLE IN FULL:
LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ROBERT M. GATES, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, Defendants.

DISTRICT: C.D. CALIFORNIA

JUDGE: Virginia Phillips

DISTRICT COURT NUMBER: CV04-8425 VAP (Ex) DATE NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED: 10/14/10 IS THIS A CROSS-APPEAL?

G YES

IF THIS MATTER HAS BEEN BEFORE THIS COURT PREVIOUSLY, PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCKET NUMBER AND CITATION (IF ANY):

No. 08-56185

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ACTION AND RESULT BELOW:

DAVID ZELICKSON, The District Court ruled 10 U.S.C. s. 654 and its implementing regulations unconstitutional. It subsequently entered a world-wide injunction precluding the Department of Defense from enforcing the statute and implementing regulations. Intervenor.

PRINCIPAL ISSUES PROPOSED TO BE RAISED ON APPEAL:
Whether 10 U.S.C. s. 654 and its implementing regulations are constitutional and whether the District Court erred in entering a world-wide injunction precluding enforcement of the statute and implementing regulations.

PLEASE IDENTIFY ANY OTHER LEGAL PROCEEDING THAT MAY HAVE A BEARING ON THIS CASE (INCLUDE PENDING DISTRICT COURT POST-JUDGMENT MOTIONS):
Witt v. United States Department of the Air Force, C06-5195-RBL (W.D. Wash.)

DOES THIS APPEAL INVOLVE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:

G Possibility of settlement G Likelihood that intervening precedent will control outcome of appeal $ G Likelihood of a motion to expedite or to stay the appeal, or other procedural matters (specify)
Defendants may seek to expedite consideration of the appeal.

G Any other information relevant to the inclusion of this case in the Mediation Program

G Possibility parties would stipulate to binding award by Appellate Commissioner in lieu of submission to judges.
Effective 7/1/2000

A-11a (10/00)

CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT

Page 1 of 2

LOWER COURT INFORMATION
JURISDICTION FEDERAL
$ G FEDERAL

Page 2 of 2

DISTRICT COURT DISPOSITION TYPE OF JUDGMENT / ORDER APPEALED RELIEF

APPELLATE
$ G FINAL DECISION OF

QUESTION

DISTRICT COURT

G DIVERSITY G OTHER
(SPECIFY)

G INTERLOCUTORY

DECISION APPEALABLE AS OF RIGHT ORDER CERTIFIED BY DISTRICT JUDGE (SPECIFY):

G INTERLOCUTORY

G G G G $ G G G G G

DEFAULT JUDGMENT DISMISSAL / JURISDICTION DISMISSAL / MERITS SUMMARY JUDGMENT JUDGMENT / COURT DECISION JUDGMENT / JURY VERDICT DECLARATORY JUDGMENT JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OTHER (SPECIFY):

G DAMAGES:

SOUGHT $ AWARDED $ $ G INJUNCTIONS: G PRELIMINARY $ G PERMANENT $ G GRANTED G DENIED

0

G ATTORNEY FEES:
SOUGHT $ 0 AWARDED $ G PENDING
0

G OTHER (SPECIFY):

G COSTS: $

CERTIFICATION OF COUNSEL
I CERTIFY THAT: 1. COPIES OF ORDER / JUDGMENT APPEALED FROM ARE ATTACHED. 2. A CURRENT SERVICE LIST OR REPRESENTATION STATEMENT WITH TELEPHONE AND FAX NUMBERS IS ATTACHED ( SEE 9TH CIR. RULE 3-2 3. A COPY OF THIS CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT WAS SERVED IN COMPLIANCE WITH FRAP 25. 4. I UNDERSTAND THAT FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THESE FILING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS, INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THIS APPEAL.

/s/ Paul Freeborne
Signature

10/14/10

Date

COUNSEL WHO COMPLETED THIS FORM
NAME: Paul Freeborne FIRM: U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division ADDRESS: P.O. Box 883
Washington, D.C. 20530

E-MAIL: [e-mail] TELEPHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
* THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD BE FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT WITH THE NOTICE OF APPEAL* * IF FILED LATE, IT SHOULD BE FILED DIRECTLY WITH THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS*
Effective 7/1/2000

A-11a (10/00)

CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT

Page 1 of 2