Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al

Filing 239

NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following deficiency was found incorrect document type selected: RE MOTION to Produce Documents - DECLARATION OF DR. NORM ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS - #236 . (ca)

Download PDF
Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al Doc. 239 CLEAR FORM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Perfect 10 Inc. PLAINTIFF(S) CASE NUMBER CV 04-9484-AHM-SH v. Google Inc., et al DEFENDANT(S). NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: Pursuant to General Order 06-07, Local Rule 5-4 and/or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the following deficiency(ies) has been found with your electronically filed document: November 6, 2007 Date Filed 236 Doc. No. Declaration Title of Doc. ERRORS WITH DOCUMENT G Document submitted in the wrong case. G Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. G Document linked incorrectly to the wrong document. G Incorrect Document Type selected (i.e., event selected does not match document attached). G Case number is incorrect or missing. G Proof of Service is missing for non-electronically served parties. G Hearing information is missing. G Hearing information incorrect. G Case is closed. G Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. G Title page is missing. G Other Note: In response to this notice the court may order: 1) an amended or correct document to be filed, 2) the document stricken, or 3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. Clerk, U.S. District Court Dated: November 6, 2007 By: Celia Reed Deputy Clerk cc: Assigned District Judge and/or Magistrate Judge G-112A (01/07) NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?