Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al

Filing 310

MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court DENIES Defendant Google Inc.s ex parte application for a continuance of the July 7, 2008 hearing on Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. Defendant has not established good cause for the five week continuance it requests. In light of Plaintiffs acquiescence to a one week continuance, the Court hereby continues the hearing date to July 14, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. before Judge A. Howard Matz. Defendants opposition is due June 30, 2008 and Plaintiffs reply is due July 7, 2008. (smo)

Download PDF
Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al Doc. 310 O UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Title CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) PERFECT 10, INC. v. GOOGLE, INC., et al. Date June 19, 2008 Present: The Honorable Stephen Montes Deputy Clerk A. HOWARD MATZ, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Not Reported Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys NOT Present for Defendants: Attorneys NOT Present for Plaintiffs: Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS (No Proceedings Held) The Court DENIES Defendant Google Inc.'s ex parte application for a continuance of the July 7, 2008 hearing on Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint.1 Defendant has not established good cause for the five week continuance it requests. In light of Plaintiff's acquiescence to a one week continuance, the Court hereby continues the hearing date to July 14, 2008. Defendant's opposition is due June 30, 2008 and Plaintiff's reply is due July 7, 2008. : Initials of Preparer SMO 1 Docket No. 308. CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1 CV-90 (06/04) Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?