Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al
Filing
326
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside Counsel's Eyes Only; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel)
Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al
O U
N
CA
Doc. 326
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Rachel M. Herrick (Bar No. 191060) rachelherrick@quinnemanuel. com 555 Twin Dolphin Dr., Suite 560 Redwood Shores, California 94065 Telephone: 650-801-5000 Facsimile: 650-801-5100 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PERFECT 10, INC., a California corporation
PLAINTIFF(S) V. ASE NUMBER:
No. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) GOOGLE INC., a corporation NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING
DEFENDANT(S).
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: The above-mentioned cause of action has been designated as an electronically filed case. In accordance with General Order 08-02 and Local Rule 5-4 the following document(s) or item(s) will be manually filed. List Documents: Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside Counsel's Eyes Only; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. Document Description: u u u Administrative Record Exhibits Ex Parte Application for authorization of investigative, expert or other services pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act (pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.4(h) ther
d
Reason: g u u u u
nder Seal Items not conducive to e-filing (i.e., videotapes, CDROM, large graphic charts) Electronic versions are not available to filer Per Court order dated Manual Filing required (reason):
August 4, 2008 Date
Rachel M. Herrick ttorney Name Google Inc. Party Represented
Note: File one Notice in each case, each time you manually file document(s).
G-92 (02/08) OTICE OF MANUAL FILING
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?