Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al
Filing
357
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Further Declaration of Charles Rosenberg in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside Counsel's Eyes Only. (Herrick, Rachel)
Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al
O
N
A
Doc. 357
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP
Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417) michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3I00 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PERFECT 10, INC., a California corporation
PLAINTIFF(S) CASE NUMBER:
CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx)
v. GOGGLE INC., a corporation NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING
DEFENDANT(S).
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: The above-mentioned cause of action has been designated as an electronically filed case. In accordance with General Order 08-02 and Local Rule 5-4 the following document(s) or item(s) will be manually filed. List Documents: Further Declaration of Charles Rosenberg in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside Counsel's Eyes Only; Google Inc.'s Application and (Proposed) Order. to Seal; Proof of Service Document Description: u u u Administrative Record Exhibits Ex Parte Application for authorization of investigative, expert or other services pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act (pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.4(h) ther
d
Reason:
Under Seal u u u u Items not conducive to e-filing (i.e., videotapes, CDROM, large graphic charts) Electronic versions are not available to filer Per Court order dated Manual Filing required (reason):
September 18, 2008 Date
Rachel M. Herrick ttorney Name Google Inc. Party Represented
Note: File one Notice in each case, each time you manually file document(s).
G-92 (02/08) OTICE OF MANUAL FILING
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?