Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al

Filing 375

STATEMENT Regarding the Court's Minute Order Regarding the Status Conference of October 6, 2008 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc ; Statement by Google Inc. re: Status Conference, #370 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Zeller, Michael)

Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al

Doc. 37

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417) michaelzeller@quinne manuel.com 2 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor 3 Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) charlesverhoeven@quinne manuel.com 5 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 6 San Francisco, California 94111 Rachel M. Herrick (Bar No. 191060) [e-mail] 7 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 8 Redwood Shores, California 94065-213 9 Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) [Consolidated with Case No. CV 054753 AHM (SHx)] GOOGLE INC.'S STATEMENT REGARDING THE COURT'S MINUTE ORDER REGARDING THE STATUS CONFERENCE OF OCTOBER 6, 2008 Hon. A. Howard Matz

13 PERFECT 10, INC., a California corporation, 14 Plaintiff, 15 vs. 16 GOOGLE INC., a corporation; and 17 DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 18 19 20 22 23 vs. Defendants. AND COUNTERCLAIM

PERFECT 10, INC., a California 21 corporation, Plaintiff,

24 AMAZON.COM, INC., a corporation; A9.COM, INC., a corporation; and 25 DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 26 27 28
51320/2682770.1

Defendants.

Case No. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) [Consolidated with Case No. CV 05-4753 AHM (SHx)] GOOGLE INC.'S STATEMENT REGARDING MINUTE ORDER Dockets.Justia.com

1

Defendant Google Inc. ("Google") respectfully submits this Statement

2 regarding the Court's Minute Order regarding the Status Conference of October 6, 3 2008 (attached hereto as Exhibit A). In that Minute Order, the Court indicated that 4 Michael Zeller, counsel for Google in Perfect 10, Inc. v. Google Inc., No. 04-cv5 9484 AHM (SHx), is to meet and confer with Jeffrey Mausner, counsel for plaintiff 6 Perfect 10 in that and related actions. 7 Google's understanding of the Court's directive from the bench at the Status 8 Conference, however, is that Mr. Mausner was ordered to meet and confer with 9 Andrew Bridges, counsel for Microsoft Corporation in Perfect 10, Inc. v. Microsoft 10 Corporation, No. 07-cv-5156, rather than with Mr. Zeller. Relevant portions of the 11 Transcript on which Google's understanding is based are attached as Exhibit B. 12 Google apologizes for having to raise this matter with the Court, but Google 13 takes its responsibilities under this Court's Orders seriously and wants to ensure that 14 there is no misunderstanding of its obligations on its part. Google is informed that 15 counsel for Microsoft, Amazon.com, Inc., Alexa Internet and A9.com all share 16 Google's understanding that Mr. Mausner was ordered to meet and confer with Mr. 17 Bridges, and not Mr. Zeller. Google asked Perfect 10 in writing to confirm that it 18 has the same understanding, but Google did not receive the courtesy of a response 19 from Perfect 10. 20 21 DATED: October 31, 2008 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
51320/2682770.1

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP By /s/ Michael T. Zeller Michael T. Zeller Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc.

Case No. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) [Consolidated with Case No. CV 05-4753 AHM (SHx)] GOOGLE INC.'S STATEMENT REGARDING MINUTE ORDER

-1-