Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al

Filing 401

MINUTES OF Status Conference held before Judge A. Howard Matz: Court orders Mr. Mausner to provide the exact number of "combinations" to the Court by not later than December 19, 2008. Order to issue. Court orders that parties to agree on a sequence of pending motions but intends to start with A9's motion. The Court will not accept any further papers on plaintiff's fully briefed motions for summary judgment. Court Reporter: Leandra Amber. (jp)

Download PDF
Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al Doc. 401 O UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV2004-09484-AHM (SHx)/ CV2005-04753-AHM (SHx) CV2007-05156 AHM (SHx) PERFECT 10, INC. v. GOOGLE, INC., et al. PERFECT 10, INC. v. AMAZON.COM, INC., et al. PERFECT 10, INC. v. MICROSOFT CORP., et al. Date December 18, 2008 Title Present: The Honorable Stephen Montes Deputy Clerk A. HOWARD MATZ, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Leandra Amber Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Defendants: Andrew P. Bridges Jennifer A. Golinveaux Michael T. Zeller Rachel M. Herrick Anthony J. Malutta Timothy R. Cahn Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Jeffrey N. Mausner Melanie Poblete Proceedings: Status Conference Cause called; appearances made. Also present is the Honorable Stephen Hillman, Magistrate Judge. Court circulates tentative order and hears oral argument. Court orders Mr. Mausner to provide the exact number of "combinations" to the Court by not later than December 19, 2008. Order to issue. Court orders that parties to agree on a sequence of pending motions but intends to start with A9's motion. The Court will not accept any further papers on plaintiff's fully briefed motions for summary judgment. : Initials of Preparer SMO 28 CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?