Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al

Filing 465

STIPULATION for Order BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: ENTITLEMENT TO SAFE HARBOR UNDER 17 U.S.C. 512(B), (C) & (D) filed by Defendant Google Inc.(Herrick, Rachel)

Download PDF
Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al Doc. 465 1 [COUNSEL INFORMATION ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Master Case No.: 04-9484 AHM (SHx) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: ENTITLEMENT TO SAFE HARBOR UNDER 17 U.S.C. § 512(B), (C) & (D) Discovery Cut-Off Date: None Set Pretrial Conference Date: None Set Trial Date: None Set PERFECT 10, INC., a California 9 corporation, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 GOOGLE INC., a corporation; and 13 DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 14 Defendants. 15 ______________________________ 16 17 AND COUNTERCLAIM 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 01980.51320/3003689.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF ENTITLEMENT TO SAFE HARBOR UNDER 17 U.S.C. § 512 Dockets.Justia.com Case No.: 04-9484 AHM (SHx) 1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417) michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 2 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor 3 Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 4 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 5 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 6 San Francisco, California 94111 Rachel Herrick Kassabian (Bar No. 191060) rachelkassabian@quinnemanuel.com 7 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 8 Redwood Shores, California 94065 9 Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. 10 JEFFREY N. MAUSNER (State Bar No. 122385) 11 Law Offices of Jeffrey N. Mausner Warner Center Towers, Suite 910 12 21800 Oxnard Street Woodland Hills, California 91367-3640 13 Telephone: (310) 617-8100, (818) 992-7500 Facsimile: (818) 716-2773 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 01980.51320/3003689.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF ENTITLEMENT TO SAFE HARBOR UNDER 17 U.S.C. § 512 -1- Case No.: 04-9484 AHM (SHx) 1 Defendant/Counterclaimant Google Inc. and Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. 2 (hereinafter "the parties") jointly submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order 3 regarding the briefing and hearing on Google's Motions for Summary Judgment Re: 4 Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b), (c), and (d) 5 ("Google's DMCA Motions"), filed July 2, 2009. In the Court's Minute Order issued 6 July 8, 2009, the Court observed that "the parties have not proposed deadlines for 7 opposition and reply briefs [regarding Google's DMCA Motions]. The Court requires 8 the oppositions to Google's DMCA motions to be filed by July 27, 2009 and the 9 replies to be filed by August 3, 2009." 10 In an effort to narrow the scope of the scheduling disputes in need of resolution 11 by this Court, the parties had reached an agreement on a proposed briefing and 12 hearing schedule regarding Google's DMCA Motions. However, Google did not 13 submit that agreement to the Court along with its Ex Parte Application, because the 14 agreement was contingent upon how the Court ruled on the Application. Google 15 apologizes for any inconvenience this may have caused this Court, and respectfully 16 requests that the Court adopt the parties' agreed schedule (set forth below) as the 17 Order of this Court. 18 19 STIPULATION WHEREAS, on July 2, 2009, Google filed Motions for Summary Judgment 20 Re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b), (c), and (d) 21 ("Google's DMCA Motions"); 22 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to an extended briefing schedule whereby 23 Perfect 10 shall have five weeks to respond to Google's DMCA Motions, Google 24 shall have four weeks to reply, and the hearing shall be calendared for four weeks 25 thereafter (unless otherwise ordered by the Court); 26 28 01980.51320/3003689.1 THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate to the following briefing schedule in 27 connection with Google's DMCA Motions: Case No.: 04-9484 AHM (SHx) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF ENTITLEMENT TO SAFE HARBOR UNDER 17 U.S.C. § 512 1 2 2009; 3 5 7 9 10 11 1. 2. 3. Perfect 10's oppositions to Google's Motions shall be due on August 10, Google's reply papers in support of its DMCA Motions shall be due on The hearing on Google's DMCA Motions shall be calendared for 4 September 8, 2009; 6 October 5, 2009, or such other hearing date as is convenient for the Court. Respectfully submitted, QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP By /s/ Rachel Herrick Kassabian Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. 8 Dated: July 9, 2009 12 Dated: July 9, 2009 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 01980.51320/3003689.1 LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER By: Jeffrey N. Mausner Jeffrey N. Mausner Attorneys for Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF ENTITLEMENT TO SAFE HARBOR UNDER 17 U.S.C. § 512 -1- Case No.: 04-9484 AHM (SHx) 1 2 3 4 5 1. [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, it is hereby ordered as follows: Perfect 10's oppositions to Google's Motions for Summary Judgment 6 Re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b), (c), and (d) 7 ("Google's DMCA Motions") shall be due on August 10, 2009; 8 10 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 01980.51320/3003689.1 2. 3. Google's reply papers in support of its DMCA Motions shall be due on The hearing on Google's DMCA Motions shall be set for October 5, 9 September 8, 2009; 11 2009, or such other hearing date as is convenient for the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. , 2009 By 13 DATED: July A. Howard Matz UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF ENTITLEMENT TO SAFE HARBOR UNDER 17 U.S.C. § 512 -2- Case No.: 04-9484 AHM (SHx)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?