Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al

Filing 737

MINUTES OF PERFECT 10's MOTION FOR THE IMPOSITION OF A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Perfect 10's Motion for the Imposition of A Document Preservation Order against Google is Denied, following oral argument on January 15, 2010. See attached order for further details.Court Recorder: 1/15/10. (es)

Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al

Doc. 737

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Title CV 04-9484-AHM (SHx) Perfect 10 Inc., v. Google Inc., et al., Date January 19, 2010

Present: The Honorable Sandra L. Butler Deputy Clerk

Stephen J. Hillman CS0 1/15/10 Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Defendants: Rachel Herrick Kassabian Tom Nolan Brad Love Mark T. Jansen

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Jeffrey N. Mausner

Proceedings:

PERFECT 10's MOTION FOR THE IMPOSITION OF A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER

Perfect 10's Motion for the Imposition of A Document Preservation Order against Google is Denied, following oral argument on January 15, 2010. No good cause has been shown. Google's Document Retention policies and procedures are adequate; there is no evidence that relevant documents have been destroyed; and Google employees have been adequately apprised to retain documents regarding this litigation. The court finds that Ms. Brewer's declaration is legally and factually sufficient.
cc: Judge Matz Magistrate Judge Hillman Parties of Record 3 Initials of Preparer : 30

CV-90 (06/04)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1

Dockets.Justia.com