Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al

Filing 973

Google's [Proposed] Order Granting re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s purported Notice re Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related) #966 Submitting Google's Responses and Objectio EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s purported Notice re Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related) #966 Submitting Google's Responses and Objectio EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s purported Notice re Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related) #966 Submitting Google's Responses and Objectio #969 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Caruso, Margret)

Download PDF
Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al Doc. 973 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PERFECT 10, INC., a California corporation, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 GOOGLE INC., a corporation; and 15 DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 01980.51320/3647770.1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STRIKE PERFECT 10, INC.'S NOTICE SUBMITTING GOOGLE'S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO PERFECT 10'S FOURTEENTH SET OF REQUESTS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Defendants. AND COUNTERCLAIM 28 Case No. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STRIKE PERFECT 10'S NOTICE SUBMITTING GOOGLE'S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO PERFECT 10'S FOURTEENTH SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Order Pursuant to Local Rules 7-19 and 7-10, Google's Ex Parte Application to 3 Strike Perfect 10's Notice Submitting Google's Responses and Objections to Perfect 4 10's Fourteenth Set of Requests for Production of Documents is hereby GRANTED 5 and P10's Notice Submitting Google's Responses and Objections to P10's Fourteenth 6 Set of Requests for the Production of Documents, Submitted in Connection with 7 P10's Motion for Review of, and Objections to, Magistrate Judge Hillman's June 16, 8 2010 Order (Dkt. No. 966) is hereby STRICKEN and will not be considered. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 DATED: August __, 2010 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 01980.51320/3647770.1 A. Howard Matz United States District Judge 28 Case No. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) -2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STRIKE PERFECT 10'S NOTICE SUBMITTING GOOGLE'S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO PERFECT 10'S FOURTEENTH SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?