James H Donell v. Donald LaFavor

Filing 30

RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of James H Donell and against Donald LaFavor, in the principal amount of $11,087.95, interest in the amount of $5,791.08, attorneys fees of $0.00, costs of $0.00 for a total judgment of $16,879.03. Related to: First APPLICATION for Renewal of Judgment re Judgment 29 . SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER AND COMPLETE DETAILS. (jre) Modified on 7/22/2016 (jre).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Paul P. Young, State Bar No. 257571 Joseph Chora, State Bar No. 284700 Chora Young LLP 2667 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite B Pasadena, CA 91107 (626) 744-1838 (626) 744-3167 (Facsimile) Attorneys for Plaintiff, James H. Donell Federal Receiver 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 10 12 JAMES H. DONELL, Receiver for J T Wallenbrock and Associates and Citadel Capital Management Group Inc, 13 Plaintiffs, 11 14 RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK vs. 15 Case No. 2:05-CV-06725-ER-SHx Donald LaFavor, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 Based upon the application for renewal of the judgment of the original judgment, and pursuant to F.R.C.P. 69(a) and Cal. Code Civ. Proc. §§ 683.110 through 683.320, and for good cause appearing, therefore: 21 The judgment in favor of James H. Donell, Receiver for J T Wallenbrock and Associates 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 and Citadel Capital Management Group Inc. and to and against Defendant Donald LaFavor entered on July 21, 2006 is hereby renewed in the amounts set forth below: Renewal of Money Judgment: a. b. c. d. Total judgment Costs after judgment Attorney’s fees Subtotal $ $ 11,087.95 0.00 0.00 11,087.95 -1RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT 1 2 3 e. f. g. h. i. Interest after judgment Subtotal Credits after judgment Fee for filing renewal Total renewed judgment $ $ 5,791.08 16,879.03 0.00 0.00 16,879.03 4 5 6 7 DATED: 7/21/2016 s/ J. Remigio ______________________________________ Deputy Clerk 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?