James H Donell v. Donald LaFavor
Filing
30
RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of James H Donell and against Donald LaFavor, in the principal amount of $11,087.95, interest in the amount of $5,791.08, attorneys fees of $0.00, costs of $0.00 for a total judgment of $16,879.03. Related to: First APPLICATION for Renewal of Judgment re Judgment 29 . SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER AND COMPLETE DETAILS. (jre) Modified on 7/22/2016 (jre).
1
2
3
4
5
Paul P. Young, State Bar No. 257571
Joseph Chora, State Bar No. 284700
Chora Young LLP
2667 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite B
Pasadena, CA 91107
(626) 744-1838
(626) 744-3167 (Facsimile)
Attorneys for Plaintiff, James H. Donell
Federal Receiver
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
10
12
JAMES H. DONELL, Receiver for J T
Wallenbrock and Associates and Citadel
Capital Management Group Inc,
13
Plaintiffs,
11
14
RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK
vs.
15
Case No. 2:05-CV-06725-ER-SHx
Donald LaFavor,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
Based upon the application for renewal of the judgment of the original judgment, and
pursuant to F.R.C.P. 69(a) and Cal. Code Civ. Proc. §§ 683.110 through 683.320, and for good
cause appearing, therefore:
21
The judgment in favor of James H. Donell, Receiver for J T Wallenbrock and Associates
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
and Citadel Capital Management Group Inc. and to and against Defendant Donald LaFavor
entered on July 21, 2006 is hereby renewed in the amounts set forth below:
Renewal of Money Judgment:
a.
b.
c.
d.
Total judgment
Costs after judgment
Attorney’s fees
Subtotal
$
$
11,087.95
0.00
0.00
11,087.95
-1RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT
1
2
3
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
Interest after judgment
Subtotal
Credits after judgment
Fee for filing renewal
Total renewed judgment
$
$
5,791.08
16,879.03
0.00
0.00
16,879.03
4
5
6
7
DATED:
7/21/2016
s/ J. Remigio
______________________________________
Deputy Clerk
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?