UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. et. al. v. RAYTHEON COMPANY et al

Filing 165

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson re Stipulation for Protective Order 161 (sbu)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. STEVEN MATESKI, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. RAYTHEON COMPANY, 15 Defendant. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 06-3614 ODW (KSx) Assigned to: Hon. Otis. D. Wright II [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 17 18 Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and based 19 on the parties’ Proposed Stipulated Protective Order (“Stipulation”) filed on 20 August 15, 2016, the terms of the protective order to which the parties have 21 agreed are adopted as a protective order of this Court (which generally shall 22 govern the pretrial phase of this action) except to the extent, as set forth below, 23 that those terms have been modified by the Court’s amendment of paragraphs 4, 24 5, 6, 7, 9, and 13 of the Stipulation. 25 AGREED TERMS OF THE PROTECTIVE ORDER AS ADOPTED AND 26 MODIFIED BY THE COURT1 27 28 1 The Court’s additions to the agreed terms of the Protective Order are generally indicated in bold typeface, and the Court’s deletions are indicated by lines through the text being deleted. [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 2 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 3 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 4 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the 5 following Stipulated Protective Order. 6 1. 7 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) requires parties to show good cause for the entry of a Good Cause Statement 8 protective order by the Court. “[R]estraints placed on discovered, but not yet 9 admitted, information are not a restriction on a traditionally public source of 10 information.” Foltz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1134 11 (9th Cir. 2003). As a result, “[w]hile courts generally make a finding of good cause 12 before issuing a protective order, a court need not do so where (as here) the parties 13 stipulate to such an order.” In re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Oregon, 14 661 F.3d 417, 424 (9th Cir. 2011); Foltz, 331 F.3d at 1131 (noting a district court need 15 not require a good cause showing for discovery documents not filed with the court 16 “given the onerous burden document review entails”). In order to establish good 17 cause for this protective order, to protect the public interest, and to allow for future 18 judicial review or public challenges, the parties stipulate to the foundational facts and 19 principles upon which documents and information in this action may be determined to 20 be subject to this protective order, as set out below. 21 22 23 In addition to confidential, proprietary, or private information, this case may involve the following:  information submitted to governmental and/or regulatory agencies that is 24 exempt from public disclosure, e.g., 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4), (6), (7)(A), 25 (7)(B), (7)(C); 26 27  information subject to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, 22 C.F.R. 120 et seq.; 28 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER  1 2 information subject to the Export Administration Regulations, 15 C.F.R. §§ 730-74;  3 information that the Designating Party is under a duty to preserve as 4 confidential under an agreement with or other obligation to another 5 person, e.g., Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. JLJ Footwear, Inc., 2:14-cv- 6 00202-SVW-SS (C.D. Cal. 2014), Dkt. No. 23, pg. 2 (approving 7 protective order applicable to “[i]nformation that the Party is under a 8 duty to preserve as confidential under an agreement with or other 9 obligation to another Person”);  10 personnel and employment information, e.g., Foltz, 331 F.3d at 1134 11 (identifying “personnel information” as subject to protection); 12 Mardirossian v. Sears Holdings Man. Corp., 2:12-cv-08161-JAK-SS 13 (C.D. Cal. 2012), Dkt. No. 23, pg. 2 (identifying “personnel files and 14 other personnel-related information” as confidential); Jefferson v. Boeing 15 Co., 2:13-cv-04453-PSG-SS (C.D. Cal. 2013), Dkt. No. 18, pg. 2 16 (identifying “private personnel information of third party employees” as 17 confidential); and/or  18 information that, if subject to public disclosure, could expose individuals 19 to annoyance, embarrassment, harassment, oppression or undue burden 20 or expense, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1); cf. 11 U.S.C. § 107(c)(1)(A).1 21 Good cause exists because if such information was produced without a 22 protective order in place, then, among other things, the privacy rights of third parties 23 protected under constitutional, statutory, regulatory, and common law principles 24 would be violated; third parties could be exposed to embarrassment, theft, fraud, or 25 harassment; a Producing Party could be accused of breaching a statutory, regulatory, 26 contractual, or common law duty to protect private and/or proprietary information 27 1 28 By identifying these categories of information potentially subject to designation as Confidential Information, neither party waives any objections to discovery. See infra sections I.A.20. 3 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 from public disclosure; or competitors could unfairly leverage the time, money, and 2 expertise invested by a Producing Party to develop non-public, proprietary 3 information (such as business and marketing plans, research, pricing and sales 4 information, technical designs, engineering solutions, best practices, and trade 5 secrets), thereby irreparably injuring the Producing Party in the marketplace. 6 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, but also adequately protect 7 Confidential Information, a protective order is justified. 8 2. 9 The term “Protected Material” shall mean information or documents designated Definitions 10 as “Confidential Information” and/or “EXPORT-CONTROL-RESTRICTED” 11 information. 12 The term “Producing Party” means the party or non-party producing or 13 disclosing documents or information that are designated as Protected Material under 14 this Order. 15 16 The term “Receiving Party” shall mean the party or parties to whom Protected Material is produced or otherwise disclosed. 17 3. 18 This Order shall be applicable to and govern all Protected Material produced, Scope 19 furnished, or created during the course of this Action, including any materials or 20 information sought from a non-party who receives a subpoena in connection with this 21 Action or otherwise produces materials or information in this Action. The Protected 22 Material subject to this Order includes, but is not limited to, materials and information 23 produced in response to requests for production of documents; answers to 24 interrogatories; answers to requests for admission; responses to requests for 25 production of documents; deposition testimony, exhibits, transcripts, and videotapes; 26 all other discovery, pleadings, briefs, memoranda, affidavits, transcripts; and other 27 materials furnished by or on behalf of any party to this Action. Any summary, 28 4 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 analysis, description, compilation, notes, excerpt, copy, electronic image or database 2 containing Protected Material shall be subject to the terms of this Order to the same 3 extent as the material or information from which such summary, analysis, description, 4 compilation, notes, excerpt, copy, electronic image, or database is made or derived. 5 This Order applies to all Protected Material produced in this Action, regardless 6 of whether such document or information was produced prior to or after entry of this 7 Order. 8 In the event that non-parties produce Protected Material in connection with this 9 Action, the production may be made subject to the provisions of this Order, including 10 because a Party may designate material produced by non-parties as Protected Material. 11 As necessary and appropriate to uphold the terms of this Order, the existence of this 12 Order may be disclosed to any person (including any non-party served with a 13 subpoena in this action) producing Protected Material in this Action. 14 Nothing in this Order is intended to conflict with the applicable Local Rules. 15 Insofar as anything in this Order could be interpreted as conflicting with the 16 applicable Local Rules, the Local Rules will govern. Any use of Protected Material 17 during a court hearing or at trial shall be governed by the orders of the presiding 18 judge. 19 4. 20 Any party or non-party may designate information, documents, or deposition Confidential Information 21 testimony produced in this Action as “Confidential Information” if such party has the 22 reasonable and good faith belief that such information is non-public and constitutes 23 her, his, or its trade secret, other confidential information within the meaning of Rule 24 26(c)(1)(G) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or is otherwise protected from 25 public disclosure as contemplated by this Order. This includes but is not limited to 26 confidential research, development, or commercial information (as those terms are 27 used in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)), and personal medical information, private personal 28 5 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 information, employment information, health information, and tax returns. Any information supplied in documentary or other tangible form may be 3 designated by the Producing Party as Confidential Information by marking or 4 stamping on each page of such document, transcript, or exhibit, or on the face of such 5 thing, the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.” 6 Where such marking of material is impossible or impractical (such as groups of 7 documents in native form), the Producing Party shall designate in writing, at the time 8 of its production, that the material contains Confidential Information. Information 9 produced by a non-party but subsequently designated as confidential by a party to the 10 Action shall be treated as Confidential Information, and the recipients shall either 11 mark their copies as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION” or 12 request that the Producing Party provide a replacement set so marked. 13 5. 14 “EXPORT-CONTROL-RESTRICTED” documents, information, material, and Export-Control-Restricted Information 15 deposition testimony may not be exported, reexported, temporarily imported, 16 transferred, or retransferred to any non-U.S. person, country, or entity, by any means, 17 without the appropriate approval of the U.S. Department of State, Directorate of 18 Defense Trade Controls (“DDTC”) for International Traffic in Arms Regulations 19 (“ITAR”) Restricted materials, and the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of 20 Industry and Security (“BIS”) for Export Administration Regulations (“EAR”) 21 Restricted materials. These restrictions also apply to United States citizens and 22 permanent residents employed by a company or organization that falls within the 23 definition of “foreign person.” See ITAR, 22 C.F.R. § 120.16. United States persons 24 employed by such a foreign organization or company are not eligible to receive ITAR- 25 controlled information absent an authorization from the DDTC or EAR-controlled 26 information absent an authorization from the BIS. 27 In any instance where information designated as EXPORT-CONTROL- 28 6 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 RESTRICTED is accessed, the person with such access shall not transfer, carry, or 2 send such information to a location outside the United States, including via any 3 electronic device or means, nor otherwise share such information with any person not 4 explicitly authorized to receive such information as set forth above. 5 EXPORT-CONTROL-RESTRICTED documents and material related to this 6 case containing technical data under the ITAR or EAR must be protected from export 7 or transfer to unauthorized foreign persons, whether located inside or outside of the 8 United States, including any foreign persons (as defined under these export control 9 regimes) that may be employed by law firms, consultants, or any other third party 10 involved in this dispute. Additionally, the furnishing of technical assistance 11 (including the disclosure or release of export-controlled technical data) may constitute 12 a “defense service,” which also requires approval. Any disclosure of produced export- 13 controlled technical data, or furnishing of technical assistance where an authorization 14 is needed but not secured, constitutes an export violation, which should be disclosed 15 to the U.S. Department of State. 16 Counsel will take all necessary steps to ensure that any EXPORT-CONTROL- 17 RESTRICTED documents and information will only be provided to, or accessible by, 18 U.S. persons serving as expert or fact witnesses, or acting on behalf of Counsel as 19 employees, contractors, vendors, or other service providers on a need to know basis. 20 Additionally, Counsel will take all necessary steps to ensure access to these 21 documents will be restricted to U.S. persons (as defined by ITAR § 120.15), that these 22 documents will not be exported to foreign persons or foreign countries, and that no 23 technical assistance directly related to controlled defense articles or other commodities 24 will be provided to foreign persons or foreign countries. Counsel will securely 25 maintain EXPORT-CONTROL-RESTRICTED documents in a password-protected 26 online repository accessible only to U.S. Persons, minimize printing and hard copy 27 storage of EXPORT-CONTROL-RESTRICTED documents, and maintain any print 28 7 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 copies in marked folders that are, when unattended, stored in locked cabinets and/or 2 offices to which only U.S. persons have access. 3 Any party or non-party may designate information, documents, or deposition 4 testimony produced in this Action as “EXPORT-CONTROL-RESTRICTED” if such 5 party has the reasonable and good faith belief that such information, documents, or 6 testimony may contain ITAR or EAR restricted materials. Any information supplied 7 in documentary or other tangible form may be designated EXPORT-CONTROL- 8 RESTRICTED by the Producing Party by marking or stamping on each page of such 9 document, transcript, or exhibit, or on the face of such thing, the legend “EXPORT- 10 CONTROL-RESTRICTED.” So long as it is consistent with applicable regulations, 11 where such marking of material is impossible or impractical, the Producing Party shall 12 designate in writing, at the time of its production, that the material contains EXPORT- 13 CONTROL-RESTRICTED. Information produced by any party or non-party but 14 subsequently designated as EXPORT-CONTROL-RESTRICTED by a party to the 15 Action shall be treated as EXPORT-CONTROL-RESTRICTED information, and the 16 recipients shall either mark their copies as “EXPORT-CONTROL-RESTRICTED” or 17 request that the Producing Party provide a replacement set so marked. 18 6. 19 All information or documents disclosed in this Action, whether or not Use of Information 20 containing Protected Material, shall be used solely for purposes of this Action and not 21 in connection with any other litigation or judicial or regulatory proceeding or for any 22 business, commercial, competitive, personal or other purpose. However, nothing in 23 this Protective Order should be construed as authorizing a Receiving Party in 24 this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court. 25 7. 26 Protected Material shall be maintained in confidence pursuant to this Order and 27 Restrictions on the Disclosure of Protected Material any applicable statutes or regulations, and shall be disclosed only to the following 28 8 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 persons: a. Counsel and in-house counsel for the parties, as well as their 3 paralegal, investigative, technical, secretarial, and clerical 4 personnel who are engaged in assisting them in the Action; 5 b. Officers and employees of the named parties, but only insofar as 6 reasonably necessary for the prosecution and defense of the 7 Action; 8 c. 9 Non-party experts or consultants retained in good faith to assist the parties in connection with the Action, provided that prior to the 10 time that any such expert or consultant is given access to Protected 11 Material, such person is provided with a copy of this Stipulated 12 Protective Order, such expert or consultant shall execute an 13 undertaking in the form of Exhibit A hereto agreeing to be bound 14 by this Stipulated Protective Order, which undertaking shall be 15 retained by counsel for the party who engaged such expert or 16 consultant, and, to the extent applicable, such person is permitted 17 access consistent with ITAR and EAR; 18 d. Any witness or potential witness and counsel for that witness or 19 potential witness. If the witness or potential witness is neither 20 currently employed by the Producing Party nor an expert witness 21 covered by subparagraph c above, the Protected Material may be 22 disclosed to the witness or potential witness only if the Protected 23 Material is relevant to the Action and to the person’s knowledge 24 and potential testimony, and provided that, prior to the time that 25 any such witness or potential witness is given access to Protected 26 Material, such person is provided with a copy of this Stipulated 27 Protective Order and (i) such person executes an undertaking in the 28 9 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 form of Exhibit A hereto agreeing to be bound by this Stipulated 2 Protective Order or, if the witness or potential witness refuses to 3 executes the undertaking, (ii) counsel giving access to Protected 4 Material advises the witness or potential witness of the provisions 5 of this Stipulated Protective Order and prevents such witness or 6 potential witness from retaining possession of any Protected 7 Material, and (iii) to the extent applicable, such person is permitted 8 access consistent with ITAR and EAR; 9 e. Court reporters, stenographers or video operators at depositions, 10 court or arbitral proceedings at which Protected Material is 11 disclosed, provided that, to the extent applicable, any such person 12 is permitted access consistent with ITAR and EAR; 13 f. Any persons requested by counsel to furnish services such as a 14 mock trial or jury profiling; translation or court reporting services; 15 demonstrative exhibit preparation; the creation of any computer 16 database from documents; or the production, reproduction, 17 organizing, filing, coding, cataloging, converting, storing, 18 retrieving and review of Protected Material, to the extent 19 reasonably necessary to assist the parties in connection with the 20 Action, provided that, to the extent applicable, any such person is 21 permitted access consistent with ITAR and EAR; and 22 g. Any other person designated by the Court, upon such terms as the 23 Court may deem proper, or agreed to by written stipulation of the 24 parties; and 25 h. The Court and its personnel. 26 Counsel is responsible for ensuring that those persons identified in subsections 27 (c), (f) and (g) of this section are aware of the terms and conditions of this Stipulated 28 10 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Protective Order, and for complying with ITAR and EAR, including by obtaining a 2 signed Confidentiality Agreement in the form attached as Exhibit A. 3 If any person wishes to submit any Protected Material to the Court, the person 4 shall, unless directed by the Court to do otherwise, comply with Local Rule 79-5, 5 including any procedures adopted under the Pilot Project for the Electronic 6 Submission and Filing of Under Seal Documents. If a person’s request to maintain a 7 submission containing Protected Material under seal is denied as to one or more 8 submissions, and the person does not seek reconsideration under the applicable Local 9 Rules or otherwise appeal the denial, then those submissions may be placed in the 10 public record. 11 8. 12 In the event that any question is asked at a deposition that involves or calls for Procedure for Designating Deposition Testimony 13 the disclosure of Protected Material, the witness shall nevertheless answer such 14 question unless he or she has an independent basis for not responding, provided that 15 the only persons in attendance at the deposition are persons who are permitted to 16 receive the Protected Material. Testimony given at a deposition may be designated as 17 Protected Material by making a statement to that effect on the record. Alternatively, 18 within thirty (30) business days after receipt of a final transcript, the parties also may 19 designate such transcript or any portion thereof by notifying all parties, in writing, of 20 the specific pages and lines of the transcript which should be treated as Protected 21 Material. All deposition transcripts shall be treated as Protected Material until thirty 22 (30) business days after receipt thereof by counsel for the parties and counsel for the 23 witness. The reporter for any deposition shall mark with the legend 24 “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “EXPORT-CONTROL-RESTRICTED,” as applicable, 25 pages that contain testimony designated as Protected Material during the deposition. 26 9. 27 This Order does not govern the conditions under which Protected Material can Use of Protected Material at Pre-trial Hearings 28 11 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 be used at pre-trial or trial proceedings. In the event that a Receiving Party intends to 2 use any documents, information, or deposition testimony designated Protected 3 Material during a pre-trial hearing that has not otherwise been identified in a motion 4 or other filing relating to the pre-trial hearing, the parties agree that the Receiving 5 Party shall notify the Producing Party reasonably in advance of the hearing so that a 6 Producing Party can raise issues relating to the designation with the Court. Nothing in 7 this provision, however, shall be construed as preventing a presiding judge from 8 allowing or permitting Protected Material to be disclosed at a pre-trial hearing, 9 limiting the right of a party to object to evidence offered without advance notice at a 10 pre-trial hearing, or as limiting a Designating Party’s right to object to or seek a 11 separate protective order to govern use of Protected Material at a pre-trial hearing. 12 10. 13 Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 502(d), disclosure of privileged or otherwise protected Inadvertent Production of Privileged Materials 14 information is not waived for purposes of other actions or proceedings by inadvertent 15 disclosure in this action. In the event any document is produced that the Producing 16 Party later claims is protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine 17 or other privilege or immunity, the production shall not be deemed a waiver or 18 impairment of any claim of privilege or protection or the subject matter thereof based 19 on the fact of its production or any delay in asserting privilege. Within five (5) 20 business days of receiving written notice, along with a log accurately describing such 21 material consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5)(A), from the Producing Party that 22 privileged or protected information was produced, the Receiving Party shall (a) return 23 all such information, and all copies thereof, to the Producing Party, reviewing such 24 information (if at all) no more than is permitted by the applicable ethical rules; 25 (b) take all reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the Receiving Party 26 disclosed it before being notified; and (c) certify that any materials prepared by the 27 Receiving Party incorporating such information, such as notes, memoranda, etc., have 28 12 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 been destroyed. If the Receiving Party wishes to challenge the claimed privilege, 2 work-product protection, or immunity, the Receiving Party must still comply with (a) 3 and (b) in the preceding paragraph, except that the Receiving Party may retain any 4 notes referencing the Confidential Information insofar as such retention is permitted 5 by the applicable ethical rules and the notes are necessary to comply with Local Rule 6 37. 7 In the event the Receiving Party wishes to challenge the claimed privilege, 8 work-product protection, or immunity, the parties shall comply with Local Rule 37 in 9 resolving their dispute. The parties agree any permissible retention of notes 10 referencing the Confidential Information for the sole purpose of complying with Local 11 Rule 37 shall not be grounds for arguing that the document is not privileged, work- 12 product-protected, or otherwise immune, or that any privilege, protection or immunity 13 was waived thereby. During the pendency of the Local Rule 37 process, the 14 Receiving Party shall make no other use or disclosure of the subject material or the 15 information contained therein. If the motion is unsuccessful, the Receiving Party shall 16 comply with (c) in the preceding paragraph. 17 11. 18 Inadvertent failure to designate any material or information as Protected Inadvertent Failure to Designate as Protected Material 19 Material pursuant to this Order shall not constitute a waiver of any otherwise valid 20 claim for protection and may be remedied by supplemental written notice. If such 21 notice is given, all information so designated shall be fully subject to this Order as if it 22 had been initially designated as Protected Material. After any designation is made in 23 accordance with this paragraph, arrangements shall be made for the return to the 24 Producing Party of all copies of the inadvertently undesignated documents and for the 25 substitution, where appropriate, of properly labeled copies. An inadvertent failure to 26 designate does not relieve a recipient of obligations under ITAR and EAR. 27 Furthermore, ITAR and EAR contain additional provisions relating to the disclosure 28 13 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 of any actual or suspected infractions regarding “EXPORT-CONTROL- 2 RESTRICTED” documents and things.2 Any party aware of actual or suspected 3 violations of ITAR and/or EAR will immediately inform, and await further 4 instructions from, the Producing Party. 5 12. 6 Nothing in this Order, nor the production of any documents or disclosure of any Purpose of Order 7 information pursuant to this Order, shall be deemed to have the effect of (i) an 8 admission or waiver, including waiver under the rules of evidence, by any party or 9 other subscriber to this Order; (ii) altering the confidentiality or nonconfidentiality of 10 any such information; or (iii) altering any existing obligation of any party or other 11 subscriber, or the absence of such obligation. 12 13. 13 If the Receiving Party disagrees with the designation by the Producing Party, Challenges to Designation as Protected Material 14 then the parties shall comply with Local Rule 37 in resolving the dispute. Pending a 15 determination by the Court, such information shall be treated by all parties as 16 Protected Material in accordance with this Order. The Designating Party shall bear 17 the burden and expense of establishing the propriety of the challenged 18 designation. 19 14. 20 If Protected Material in the possession, custody, or control of any Receiving Subpoenas 21 Party subject to this Order is sought by subpoena, motion, or other form of discovery 22 request or compulsory process, the Receiving Party to whom the process or discovery 23 request is directed, shall (i) on or before the second business day after receipt thereof, 24 give telephonic notice and written notice by hand, facsimile, or e-mail of such process 25 or discovery request, together with a copy thereof, to counsel for the Producing Party; 26 (ii) cooperate to the extent necessary to permit the Producing Party to seek to quash or 27 28 2 See, e.g., ITAR, 22 C.F.R. § 127.12; EAR, 15 C.F.R. §§ 730-44. 14 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 modify such process or discovery request, consistently with Local Rules 37 and 45; 2 and (iii) not make production or disclosure of such Protected Material until the 3 Producing Party consents in writing to production or the Receiving Party is required 4 by a court order to produce such Protected Material, so long as the order is not stayed 5 prior to the date set for production or disclosure. 6 15. 7 Within sixty (60) days after final termination of this Action, including all Disposition Upon Conclusion 8 appeals, all parties and experts, consultants and witnesses shall (i) return to the 9 Producing Party or, with the Producing Party’s written permission, destroy all 10 originals of material produced and designated as Protected Material and all identical 11 copies, whether in whole or in part, of such documents, and (ii) destroy all copies 12 thereof, as well as all notes, memoranda or other documents that summarize, discuss 13 or quote materials produced and designated as Protected Material, except that, with 14 respect to word processing and database tapes and disks, they shall destroy or erase 15 such tapes or disks to the extent practicable. Outside counsel for each party shall be 16 entitled to retain copies of any deposition transcripts and exhibits and any pleadings, 17 motions, memoranda, or exhibits that have been filed with the Court or admitted into 18 evidence and that contain or refer to information designated as Protected Material, 19 provided that all such documents shall remain subject to this Order. Counsel of record 20 for the parties shall certify in writing to each Producing Party that the foregoing has 21 been complied with. 22 16. 23 This Order shall not limit a Producing Party’s use of its own Protected Material. Parties’ Own Information 24 Such disclosures shall not affect any designation of such documents as Protected 25 Material. 26 17. 27 If Protected Material is disclosed to or comes into the possession of any person Remedies 28 15 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 other than in a manner authorized in this Order, the party responsible for the 2 disclosure shall immediately (1) inform those persons of this Order; and (2) inform the 3 person who designated the material as Protected Material and the other parties already 4 subject to this Order that are in possession of such Protected Material of all pertinent 5 facts relating to such disclosure and shall make reasonable efforts to prevent further 6 disclosure by each unauthorized person who received Protected Material. 7 This Stipulated Protective Order will be enforced under applicable law. All 8 other remedies available to any person injured by a violation of this Stipulated 9 Protective Order are fully reserved. 10 18. 11 Notice under this Stipulated Protective Order shall be to the parties as follows, 12 Notice unless this provision is modified by the parties in writing and filed with this Court: 13 Notice to Raytheon shall be made to: 14 Kimberly A. Dunne Sidley Austin LLP 555 West Fifth Street Los Angeles, CA 90013 Tel: +1.213.896.6659 kdunne@sidley.com. 15 16 17 18 Notice to Relator shall be made to: Allan J. Graf Carlsmith Ball LLP Suite 2900 515 South Flower Street Tel: +1.213.955.1200 falseclaimsact@carlsmith.com. 19 20 21 22 19. 23 Unless prohibited by a statute, court order, or applicable rule, the parties may Jurisdiction 24 extend or modify deadlines under this Order by written stipulation amongst 25 themselves or, where applicable, with third parties. 26 27 The Court retains jurisdiction to amend or modify this Order upon stipulation of the parties to this Action, motion by a party or non-party, or on its own motion. 28 16 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 20. 2 By stipulating to the entry of this Order, no Party waives any right it otherwise Right to Assert Other Objections 3 would have to object to disclosing or producing any information or item on any 4 ground not addressed in this Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on 5 any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order. 6 21. 7 Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to seek its modification 8 9 10 11 Right to Further Relief by the Court in the future. 22. Order to Remain in Force This Order shall survive and remain in full force and effect after termination of this Action. 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED 14 15 16 17 18 19 Dated: August 18, 2016 ___________________________________ KAREN L. STEVENSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 17 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER EXHIBIT A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I, ___________________________, declare that: 1. My current address is _____________________________________. My current employer is ___________________________________. My current occupation is __________________________________. 2. I have read and understand the Protective Order that has been entered in United States of America ex rel. Steven Mateski v. Raytheon Company, Case No. CV 06-3614 (ODW) (FMOx). 3. I will comply with all of the provisions of the Protective Order. I will hold in confidence, will not disclose to anyone not qualified under the Protective Order, and will use only for purposes of this action any information disclosed to me that has been designated as “Protected Material” under the terms of the Protective Order. 4. Promptly upon termination of this action, at the latest, I will return all documents and things designated as Protected Material that came into my possession, and all documents and things that I have prepared relating thereto, to the party from which I received it. 5. I hereby submit to the jurisdiction of this Court for the purpose of enforcement of the Protective Order in this action. 6. I understand that the Arms Export Control Act, ITAR, and EAR also impose criminal and civil penalties for violations of their provisions, such as the unlicensed export, disclosure, or transfer of technical data to a foreign person. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: 26 27 (SIGN NAME) (PRINT NAME 28 18 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?