Big Screen Entertainment Group Inc v. Davis

Filing 339

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court has been informed by Plaintiffs counsel that the action that Plaintiff seeks to hold Defendant in contempt for maintaining was voluntarily dismissed by Defendant on January 19, 2010. See Davis v. Estate of Salvatore Bonanno, CV09-1771-JAT (D. Ariz.), Docket Nos. 41 and 42. Therefore, The Court DENIES AS MOOT Motion to hold Defendant in contempt 336 . The Court will not welcome repeated efforts by either party to require the Court to exercise further jurisdiction over this matter. (jp)

Download PDF
O UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Title CV 06-3800 AHM (AJWx) BIG SCREEN ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC v. DAVIS Date February 12, 2010 Present: The Honorable Stephen Montes Deputy Clerk A. HOWARD MATZ, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Not Reported Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys NOT Present for Defendants: Attorneys NOT Present for Plaintiffs: Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS (No Proceedings Held) The Court has been informed by Plaintiff's counsel that the action that Plaintiff seeks to hold Defendant in contempt for maintaining was voluntarily dismissed by Defendant on January 19, 2010. See Davis v. Estate of Salvatore Bonanno, CV09-1771JAT (D. Ariz.), Docket Nos. 41 and 42. Therefore, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's motion to hold Defendant in contempt.1 The Court will not welcome repeated efforts by either party to require the Court to exercise further jurisdiction over this matter. : Initials of Preparer SMO 1 Docket No. 336. CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1 CV-90 (06/04)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?