Sublime v. Sublime Remembered

Filing 138

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO CROSS-EXAMINE DEFENDANT MIKE HOULIHAN by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Plaintiff's Request to Cross-Examine Defendant Mike Houlihan at the 5/13/2013 hearing regarding the Court's order to show ca use re: contempt 136 is GRANTED, because defendant Mike Houlihan has offered a declaration in connection the hearing. If defendant Mike Houlihan is not available for cross-examination during the hearing, his declaration shall not be considered by the Court. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 06-6059 CAS (CWx) Title SUBLIME, ET AL. V. SUBLIME REMEMBERED, ET AL. Present: The Honorable Date May 7, 2013 CHRISTINA A. SNYDER Catherine Jeang Deputy Clerk Not Present Court Reporter / Recorder N/A Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS); ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO CROSSEXAMINE DEFENDANT MIKE HOULIHAN (Docket #136, filed April 30, 2013) On April 30, 2013, plaintiff filed a request to cross-examine defendant Mike Houlihan at the hearing – currently scheduled for May 13, 2013 – regarding the Court’s order to show cause re: contempt. Dkt. #131. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-8, this request is GRANTED, because defendant Mike Houlihan has offered a declaration in connection the hearing. If defendant Mike Houlihan is not available for cross-examination during the hearing, his declaration shall not be considered by the Court. See L.R. 7-8 (“No declaration of a declarant with respect to whom such a request has been granted shall be considered unless such declarant is personally present and available at the hearing for such cross-examination as the Court may permit.”). IT IS SO ORDERED. 00 Initials of Preparer CV-13-1820 CAS (Ex) (04/13) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL : 00 CMJ Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?